City of Ann Arbor Employees' Retirement System v. Accuray Incorporated et al, No. 4:2009cv03362 - Document 42 (N.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER granting Stipulation to Consolidate Cases ( C-09-3637-CW and C-09-3813-CW ) re (9 in 4:09-cv-03637-CW) Stipulation, filed by Wade B. Hampton, Robert S. Weiss, John R. Adler, Jr., Robert E. McNamara, Accuray Incorporated, Wayne Wu, Ted Tu , Euan S. Thomson, (29 in 4:09-cv-03362-CW) Stipulation, filed by Wade B. Hampton, Robert S. Weiss, John R. Adler, Jr., Robert E. McNamara, Accuray Incorporated, City of Ann Arbor Employees' Retirement System, Wayne Wu, Ted Tu, Euan S. Thomson. ***FOR FURTHER DOCKET ENTRIES, SEE LEAD CONSOLIDATED ACTION C-09-3362-CW***. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/72/009. (cp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2009) Modified on 12/23/2009 (cp, COURT STAFF).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
City of Ann Arbor Employees&#039; Retirement System v. Accuray Incorporated et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Doc. 42 BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838, boris.feldman@wsgr.com IGNACIO E. SALCEDA, State Bar No. 164017, isalceda@wsgr.com DIANE M. WALTERS, State Bar No. 148136, dwalters@wsgr.com MOLLY ARICO, State Bar No. 260472, marico@wsgr.com WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Defendants Accuray Incorporated, Euan S. Thomson, Robert E. McNamara, Wade B. Hampton, Ted Tu, Wayne Wu, John R. Adler, Jr., and Robert S. Weiss 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 OAKLAND DIVISION 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 CITY OF ANN ARBOR EMPLOYEES’ ) RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on Behalf of Itself and ) All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) ACCURAY INCORPORATED, EUAN S. ) THOMSON, ROBERT E. McNAMARA, ) WADE B. HAMPTON, TED TU, WAYNE WU, ) JOHN R. ADLER, JR., and ROBERT S. WEISS, ) ) Defendants. ) ) CASE NO.: 09-cv-03362-CW STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONSOLIDATION OF SECURITIES CLASS ACTIONS AND SCHEDULE 25 26 CAPTIONS CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSOLIDATION AND SCHEDULE, CASE NOS. CV 09-3362 CW, CV 09-3637 CW, CV 09-3813 PJH Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 MICHAEL WHITTEN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 3 4 5 6 Plaintiffs, v. ACCURAY INCORPORATED, EUAN S. THOMSON, ROBERT E. McNAMARA, WADE B. HAMPTON, TED TU, WAYNE WU, JOHN R. ADLER, JR., and ROBERT S. WEISS, 7 Defendants. 8 9 DOUG BENNINGTON, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, 10 Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 13 14 15 ACCURAY INCORPORATED, EUAN S. THOMSON, ROBERT E. McNAMARA, WADE B. HAMPTON, TED TU, WAYNE WU, JOHN R. ADLER, JR., and ROBERT S. WEISS, Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSOLIDATION AND SCHEDULE, CASE NOS. CV 09-3362 CW, CV 09-3637 CW, CV 09-3813 PJH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 09-cv-03637-CW CASE NO.: 09-cv-03813-PJH 1 Pursuant to Rule 16(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Civil Local Rule 23-1(b), 2 and the Manual for Complex Litigation, Fourth §§ 11.12, 11.21 and 31 (2004), the parties 3 stipulate, and the Court hereby orders, as follows: 4 5 CONSOLIDATION OF RELATED CASES 1. The above-captioned actions, City of Ann Arbor Employees’ Retirement System v. 6 Accuray, Inc., et al., Case No. C-09-03362-CW, Whitten v. Accuray, Inc., et al., Case No. C-09- 7 03637-CW, and Bennington v. Accuray, Inc., et al., Case No. C-09-03813-PJH, are related cases 8 within the meaning of Civil Local Rule 3-12. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), 9 these cases are hereby consolidated into Civil Action No. C-09-03362-CW for pretrial 10 proceedings before this Court. The consolidated action shall be captioned: “In re Accuray Inc. 11 Securities Litigation.” 12 2. All related actions that are subsequently filed in, or transferred to, this District 13 shall be consolidated into this consolidated action for pretrial purposes. This Order shall apply to 14 every such related action, absent order of the Court. A party that objects to such consolidation, 15 or to any other provision of this Order, must file an application for relief from this Order within 16 thirty (30) days after the date on which a copy of the order is mailed to the party’s counsel, 17 pursuant to Paragraph 8, infra. 18 3. Plaintiff City of Ann Arbor Employees’ Retirement System has served its 19 complaint on all defendants. Defendants agree to waive service of the Whitten and Bennington 20 complaints. 21 22 4. This Order is entered without prejudice to the rights of any party to apply for severance of any claim or action, for good cause shown. 23 24 25 26 MASTER DOCKET AND CAPTION 5. The docket in Civil Action No. C-09-03362-CW shall constitute the master docket for this action. 6. Every pleading filed in the consolidated action shall bear the following caption: 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSOLIDATION AND SCHEDULE, CASE NOS. CV 09-3362 CW, CV 09-3637 CW, CV 09-3813 PJH -1- 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 OAKLAND DIVISION 4 IN RE ACCURAY INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 5 6 7 This Document Relates To: 8 9 10 7. Master File No. C-09-03362-CW CLASS ACTION The file in Civil Action No. C-09-03362-CW shall constitute a Master File for 11 every action in the consolidated action. When the document being filed pertains to all actions, 12 the phrase “All Actions” shall appear immediately after the phrase “This Document Relates To:”. 13 When a pleading applies only to some, but not all, of the actions, the document shall list, 14 immediately after the phrase “This Document Relates To:”, the docket number for each 15 individual action to which the document applies, along with the last name of the first-listed 16 plaintiff in said action (e.g., “No. C-09-03362-CW (City of Ann Arbor Employees’ Retirement 17 System)).” 18 8. The parties shall file a Notice of Related Cases pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12 19 whenever a case that should be consolidated into this action is filed in, or transferred to, this 20 District. If the Court determines that the case is related, the clerk shall: 21 a) place a copy of this Order in the separate file for such action; 22 b) serve on plaintiff’s counsel in the new case a copy of this Order; 23 c) direct that this Order be served upon defendants in the new case; and 24 d) make the appropriate entry in the Master Docket. 25 26 LEAD PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL 9. The Court shall designate a Lead Plaintiff and Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel, pursuant 27 to 15 U.S.C. § 77z-1(a)(3)(B) and 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B). Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel shall 28 have authority to speak for, and enter into agreements on behalf of, plaintiffs in all matters STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSOLIDATION AND SCHEDULE, CASE NOS. CV 09-3362 CW, CV 09-3637 CW, CV 09-3813 PJH -2- 1 regarding pretrial procedures, discovery, and settlement negotiations. Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel 2 shall manage the prosecution of this litigation to avoid duplicative or unproductive activities. 3 Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel shall be responsible for coordination of all activities and appearances on 4 behalf of plaintiffs and for dissemination of notices and orders. Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel shall be 5 responsible for communications with the Court. 6 7 10. Defendants’ counsel may rely upon agreements made with Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel. Such agreements shall be binding on all plaintiffs. 8 PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS 9 11. No defendant is required to respond to the complaint in any action consolidated 10 into this action, other than a consolidated complaint or a complaint designated as the operative 11 complaint after the appointment of Lead Plaintiff and Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel. 12 12. After the appointment of a Lead Plaintiff, the Lead Plaintiff shall have sixty (60) 13 days to file and serve a consolidated complaint. The consolidated complaint shall be the 14 operative complaint and shall supersede all complaints filed in any of the actions consolidated 15 herein. 16 13. Defendants shall have sixty (60) days in which to file and serve a motion to 17 dismiss or otherwise respond to the consolidated complaint. If defendants file any motions 18 directed at the consolidated complaint, the opposition and reply briefs shall be filed within sixty 19 and thirty days, respectively, of that response, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. 20 14. Counsel for the parties shall notify their clients of their document preservation 21 obligations pursuant to the federal securities laws and the Local Rules. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSOLIDATION AND SCHEDULE, CASE NOS. CV 09-3362 CW, CV 09-3637 CW, CV 09-3813 PJH -3- 1 Dated: September 22, 2009 Respectfully submitted, 2 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, Professional Corporation 3 BORIS FELDMAN IGNACIO E. SALCEDA DIANE M. WALTERS MOLLY ARICO 4 5 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 6 7 8 By: /s/ Diane M. Walters Diane M. Walters Email: dwalters@wsgr.com 9 Attorneys for Defendants Accuray Incorporated, Euan S. Thomson, Robert E. McNamara, Wade B. Hampton, Ted Tu, Wayne Wu, John R. Adler, Jr., and Robert S. Weiss 10 11 12 13 Dated: September 22, 2009 14 15 16 17 COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP SHAWN A. WILLIAMS 100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 288-4545 Facsimile: (415) 288-4534 21 COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP SAMUEL H. RUDMAN EVAN J. KAUFMAN 58 South Service Road, Suite 200 Melville, NY 11747 Telephone: (631) 367-7100 Facsimile: (631) 367-1173 22 By: 18 19 20 /s/ Shawn A. Williams Shawn A. Williams Email: ShawnW@csgrr.com 23 24 Attorneys for Plaintiff City of Ann Arbor Employees’ Retirement System 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSOLIDATION AND SCHEDULE, CASE NOS. CV 09-3362 CW, CV 09-3637 CW, CV 09-3813 PJH -4- 1 Dated: September 22, 2009 2 3 4 GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP LIONEL Z. GLANCY RICHARD MANISKAS 1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 311 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 201-9150 Facsimile: (310) 201-9160 5 -and6 LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD G. SMITH HOWARD G. SMITH 3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112 Bensalem, PA 19020 Telephone: (215) 638-4847 Facsimile: (215) 638-4867 7 8 9 10 By: 11 /s/ Richard Maniskas Richard Maniskas Email: rmaniskas@glancylaw.com 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff Michael E. Whitten 14 15 Dated: September 22, 2009 16 17 18 GREEN WELLING, P.C. ROBERT S. GREEN 595 Market Street, Suite 2750 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 477-6700 Facsimile: (415) 477-6710 -and- 19 SHALOV STONE BONNER & ROCCO LLP RALPH M. STONE THOMAS G. CIARLONE. JR. AMANDA C. SCUDER 485 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1000 New York, NY 10018 Telephone: (212) 239-4340 Facsimile: (212) 239-4310 20 21 22 23 24 By: 25 /s/ Robert S. Green Robert S. Green Email: cand.uscourts@classcounsel.com 26 Attorneys for Plaintiff Doug Bennington 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSOLIDATION AND SCHEDULE, CASE NOS. CV 09-3362 CW, CV 09-3637 CW, CV 09-3813 PJH -5- 1 ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 10/7/09 4 Dated: Hon. Claudia Wilken United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSOLIDATION AND SCHEDULE, CASE NOS. CV 09-3362 CW, CV 09-3637 CW, CV 09-3813 PJH -6- 1 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 2 I, Diane M. Walters, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 3 obtained from the signatories, Shawn A. Williams, Richard Maniskas and Robert S. Green. I 4 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 5 foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 22nd day of September, 2009 at Palo Alto, 6 California. 7 By: 8 /s/ Diane M. Walters Diane M. Walters 9 Counsel for Defendants Accuray Incorporated, Euan S. Thomson, Robert E. McNamara, Wade B. Hampton, Ted Tu, Wayne Wu, John R. Adler, Jr., and Robert S. Weiss 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSOLIDATION AND SCHEDULE, CASE NOS. CV 09-3362 CW, CV 09-3637 CW, CV 09-3813 PJH -7-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
