Roe et al v. Doe et al, No. 4:2009cv00682 - Document 41 (N.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER AWARDING DEFENDANTS' ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS AND STAYING ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT OF SAME WITHOUT PLAINTIFF POSTING A SUPERSEDEAS BOND IF FINAL JUDGMENT IS TIMELY APPEALED re 40 Stipulation, filed by Dallas Basketball Ltd., Mark Cuban. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/17/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2009)

Download PDF
Roe et al v. Doe et al Doc. 41 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD ROE, RICHARD ROE, II and DON A. NELSON, Individuals, Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 vs. JOHN DOE, MARK CUBAN, an individual; and DALLAS BASKETBALL, LTD., a partnership, and DOES 1 through 10, Defendants. 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 3:09-CV-682 PJH ECF ORDER AWARDING DEFENDANTS’ ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS AND STAYING ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT OF SAME WITHOUT PLAINTIFF POSTING A SUPERSEDEAS BOND IF FINAL JUDGMENT IS TIMELY APPEALED Upon review of the Stipulation of the Parties Regarding Attorneys’ Fees and Costs and Staying Enforcement of Judgment of Same Without Plaintiff Posting a Supersedeas Bond if Final Judgment is Timely Appealed, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby orders as 20 21 22 23 follows: IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Memorandum of Costs is GRANTED; 24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered against Plaintiff Don A. Nelson in 25 favor of Defendants Mark Cuban and Dallas Basketball, Ltd. in the amount of $71,224.78, 26 27 representing Defendants’ reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in pursuing and prevailing on Defendants’ Special Motion to Strike; 28 Order Awarding Defendants’ Attorneys’ Fees and Staying Enforcement of Judgment Civil Action No. 3:09-CV-682 PJH 5575733 Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff Don A. Nelson timely appeals the Court’s 2 Order Granting Defendants’ Special Motion to Strike and Final Judgment, and assuming the 3 4 5 6 Court’s order(s) are affirmed, that Defendants shall also be entitled to attorneys’ fees and costs associated with the appeal and their motion seeking reimbursement of same in an amount to be determined by the Court; 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall not seek to enforce the Court’s 8 judgment of $71,224.78 in attorneys’ fees and costs until after the time for an appeal of the 9 Court’s Order Granting Defendants’ Special Motion to Strike and Final Judgment to the Ninth 10 Circuit Court of Appeals has passed or until after a timely appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of 11 Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court is final, assuming the Court’s order(s) are affirmed; 12 13 14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Don A. Nelson shall not be required to post a supersedeas bond in order to stay the enforcement of the Court’s judgment of $71,224.78 under 15 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(d) if he timely appeals the Court’s Order Granting 16 Defendants’ Special Motion to Strike and Final Judgment. The August 26, 2009 hearing on Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees is hereby VACATED and the motion is withdrawn. RT 23 NO 22 I hyllis Judge P ER 25 lton J. Hami A H 24 R NIA 21 DERED HonorableIPhyllisOR T S SO Hamilton FO 20 UNIT ED 19 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 18 DATED: 8/17/09 LI 17 N F D IS T IC T O R C 26 27 28 Order Awarding Defendants’ Attorneys’ Fees and Staying Enforcement of Judgment Civil Action No. 3:09-CV-682 PJH 5575733 Page 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.