Elliott v. San Francisco Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board, No. 4:2008cv02352 - Document 45 (N.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT, entered in favor of Defendant. ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 3/25/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2009) Modified on 3/27/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF). Modified on 3/27/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Elliott v. San Francisco Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board Doc. 45 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 OAKLAND DIVISION 5 6 VANCE C. ELLIOT, 7 Case No: C 08-2352 SBA Plaintiff, JUDGMENT 8 vs. 9 THE SAN FRANCISCO RENT AND ARBITRATION BOARD, 10 Defendant. 11 12 13 14 In accordance with the Court’s Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT final judgment is entered in favor of Defendant. 15 16 17 Dated: March 25, 2009 ____________________________ Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 ELLIOTT et al, 4 Plaintiff, 5 v. 6 7 8 SAN FRANCISCO RENT STABILIZATION AND ARBITRATION B et al, Defendant. / 9 10 Case Number: CV08-02352 SBA 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 12 13 14 15 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on March 26, 2009, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 18 19 Vance S. Elliott 74 Sixth Street, #226 San Francisco, CA 94103-1608 20 Dated: March 26, 2009 21 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
