Berson v. Applied Signal Technology Inc. et al, No. 4:2005cv01027 - Document 104 (N.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 7/30/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2009) Modified on 8/4/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Berson v. Applied Signal Technology Inc. et al 1 2 3 4 Doc. 104 JEFFREY S. NOBEL (jnobel@izardnobel.com) MARK P. KINDALL (Bar #138703) (mkindall@izardnobel.com) IZARD NOBEL LLP 29 South Main Street, Suite 215 West Hartford, CT 06107 Tel: (860) 493-6292 | Fax: (860) 493-6290 5 Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff 6 ALAN R. PLUTZIK (Bar #077785) (APlutzik@ bramsonplutzik.com) BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER & BIRKHAEUSER, LLP 2125 Oak Grove Road, Suite 120 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 Tel: (925) 945-0200 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION IN RE APPLIED SIGNAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION MASTER FILE NO. C 05-1027 (SBA) CLASS ACTION FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 This matter came on for hearing on July 28, 2009, upon the Motion for Final Approval of the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement, dated as of March 26, 2009 (the “Settlement Stipulation”). Due and adequate notice having been given to the Settlement Class, and the Court having considered the Settlement Stipulation, all papers filed and proceedings had herein and all comments received regarding the proposed settlement, and having reviewed the entire record in the Litigation and good cause appearing, 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Final Judgment of Dismissal with Prejudice Master File No. C 05-1027(SBA) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Court, for purposes of this Final Judgment of Dismissal With 3 Prejudice (the “Judgment”), adopts all defined terms set forth in the Settlement 4 5 6 Stipulation and incorporates the terms of the Settlement Stipulation by reference herein. 2. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the above-captioned 7 Litigation (the “Litigation”), and has personal jurisdiction over Lead Plaintiff, the other 8 Members of the Settlement Class, and the Defendants. 9 10 3. The Court finds that the distribution of the Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action and Settlement Hearing, Proof of Claim and 11 Release, and publication of the Summary Notice of Pendency of Proposed Settlement of 12 13 Class Action and Settlement Hearing, as provided for in the Order Preliminarily 14 Approving Settlement, Directing Notice and Scheduling Hearing Date, constituted the 15 best notice practicable under the circumstances to apprise all Persons within the 16 definition of the Settlement Class of the pendency of the Litigation and their rights in it, 17 18 the terms of the proposed Settlement of the Litigation, and afforded Settlement Class Members with an opportunity to present their objections, if any, to the Settlement 19 20 21 Stipulation. The Court finds that the provision of notice to Settlement Class Members fully met the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the 22 requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. § 77u- 23 4(a)(7), due process and the United States Constitution. 24 25 4. The Court finds that all Persons within the definition of the Settlement Class have been adequately provided with an opportunity to remove themselves from the 26 27 28 2 [Proposed] Final Judgment of Dismissal with Prejudice Master File No. C 05-1027(SBA) 1 Settlement Class by executing and returning a "request for exclusion" in conformance 2 with the terms of the Settlement Stipulation and its exhibits. 3 5. With respect to the Settlement Class, this Court finds and concludes that, 4 for purposes of the Settlement only, that the prerequisites to a class action under Federal 5 6 Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b)(3) have been satisfied in that: (a) the number of 7 Settlement Class Members is so numerous that joinder of all members thereof is 8 impracticable; (b) there are questions of law or fact common to the Settlement Class; (c) 9 Lead Plaintiff’s claims are typical of the claims of the Settlement Class he seeks to 10 11 represent; (d) Lead Plaintiff will fairly and adequately represent the interests of the Settlement Class; (e) the questions of law or fact common to the Members of the 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Settlement Class predominate over any questions affecting only individual members of the Settlement Class; and (f) a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy. 6. This Court hereby certifies, for the purposes of this Settlement, a Settlement Class of all Persons who purchased the common stock of Applied Signal Technology, Inc. during the period between August 25, 2004 and February 22, 2005, 19 inclusive, with the exception of the following excluded Persons: Defendants, the 20 21 Company’s employees, officers, directors, members of Defendants’ immediate families, 22 any entity in which any Defendant has a controlling interest or which the Company is a 23 parent or subsidiary, those Persons who timely and validly requested exclusion from the 24 Settlement Class (identified in Exhibit 1 hereto); and the legal representatives, heirs, 25 successors or assigns of any such excluded Person. 26 27 28 3 [Proposed] Final Judgment of Dismissal with Prejudice Master File No. C 05-1027(SBA) 1 2 3 7. The Court appoints Lead Plaintiff Frank Whiting as representative of the Settlement Class; and 8. The Court appoints Izard Nobel LLP as Lead Counsel for the Settlement 4 Class and Bramson, Plutzik, Mahler & Birkhaeuser, LLP as Liaison Counsel for the 5 6 7 Settlement Class. 9. After hearing and based upon the submission of Lead Counsel, this Court 8 hereby approves the Settlement, as set forth in the Stipulation, each of the releases, and 9 other terms, as fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Settlement Class and the Settlement 10 11 Class Members. The Parties to the Settlement Stipulation are therefore hereby directed to consummate and perform its terms. 12 13 14 10. Except as to any individual claim of those Persons, if any (identified in Exhibit 1 hereto) who have validly and timely requested exclusion from the Settlement 15 Class, the Litigation and all claims contained therein, as well as all of the Released 16 Claims are dismissed with prejudice as to Lead Plaintiff and the other Members of the 17 Settlement Class, and as against the Released Persons. The Settling Parties are to bear 18 their own costs, except as otherwise provided in the Stipulation. By operation of the 19 Judgment and under the terms of the Settlement Stipulation and the releases therein, it is 20 21 intended to preclude, and shall preclude, Lead Plaintiff and all other Settlement Class 22 Members from filing or pursuing any Released Claims under federal law or the law of 23 any state. 24 25 26 11. Upon the Effective Date, Lead Plaintiff shall release and each Settlement Class Member shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and discharged all Released Claims 27 28 4 [Proposed] Final Judgment of Dismissal with Prejudice Master File No. C 05-1027(SBA) 1 (including “Unknown Claims”) against each and all of the Released Persons, whether or 2 not such Settlement Class Member executes and delivers the Proof of Claim and Release. 3 12. Upon the Effective Date, each of the Defendants shall be deemed to have, 4 and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, 5 6 relinquished and discharged all Plaintiffs, the Settlement Class Members and all 7 Plaintiffs’ Counsel, from all claims arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the 8 institution, prosecution, assertion, or resolution of the Litigation or the Released Claims. 9 10 11 13. Upon the Effective Date, all Plaintiffs, the Settlement Class Members, and all Plaintiffs' Counsel shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and discharged the Released 12 13 14 15 Persons from all claims arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the defense, or resolution of the Litigation or the Released Claims. 14. All Settlement Class Members are permanently barred and enjoined from 16 instituting or prosecuting, in any capacity, any action or proceeding that involves or 17 asserts any of the Released Claims. 18 15. Only those Settlement Class Members filing valid and timely Proofs of 19 Claim and Release shall be entitled to participate in the Settlement and receive a 20 21 distribution from the Settlement Fund. The Proof of Claim and Release to be executed by 22 the Settlement Class Members shall further release all Released Claims against the 23 Released Persons. All Settlement Class Members shall, as of the Effective Date, be 24 bound by the releases set forth herein whether or not they submit a valid and timely Proof 25 of Claim and Release. 26 27 28 5 [Proposed] Final Judgment of Dismissal with Prejudice Master File No. C 05-1027(SBA) 1 2 3 16. Neither the Stipulation nor the Settlement contained therein, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the settlement: (i) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence 4 of, the validity of any Released Claim, or of any wrongdoing or liability of the 5 6 Defendants or their Related Parties; (ii) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an 7 admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of any of the Defendants or their 8 Related Parties in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in any court, 9 administrative agency or other tribunal; or (iii) shall be offered in evidence by any 10 11 Settling Party for any purpose except as provided in this ¶ 16. Released Persons may file the Stipulation and/or the Judgment from this Litigation in any other action that may be 12 13 14 brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar, reduction, 15 or any theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim. 16 The Settling Parties, their respective counsel or any other Member of the Settlement 17 Class may file the Stipulation in any proceeding brought to enforce any of its terms or 18 provisions. 19 17. Only those Settlement Class Members identified in Exhibit 1 hereto as 20 21 22 23 having validly filed Requests for Exclusion from the Settlement Class shall not be bound by this Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal. 18. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment, the Court hereby reserves 24 and retains exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over all matters relating to the 25 administration and effectuation of the Settlement Stipulation and Settlement. 26 27 28 6 [Proposed] Final Judgment of Dismissal with Prejudice Master File No. C 05-1027(SBA) 1 2 3 19. Any order, or any objection to or appeal from any order, approving the Plan of Allocation, Fee and Expense Application, or the Lead Plaintiff’s Expense Application shall in no way disturb or affect this Judgment and shall be considered 4 separate from this Final Judgment. 5 6 20. The Court finds that the Lead Plaintiff and Defendants, and their 7 respective counsel, have, at all times during the course of the Litigation, complied with 8 the requirements of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court finds that 9 the amount paid and the other terms of the Settlement were negotiated at arm's length and 10 11 in good faith by the Settling Parties. 21. It is expressly determined, within the meaning of Rule 54(b) of the Federal 12 13 14 15 16 Rules of Civil Procedure, that there is no just reason for delay and the entry of this Judgment is hereby expressly directed. Signed this 30th day of July, 2009. BY THE COURT 17 18 19 HONORABLE SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7 [Proposed] Final Judgment of Dismissal with Prejudice Master File No. C 05-1027(SBA) 1 Exhibit 1 2 Requests for Exclusion 3 None 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8 [Proposed] Final Judgment of Dismissal with Prejudice Master File No. C 05-1027(SBA)
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
