Armstrong, et al v. Davis, et al

Filing 2193

ORDER DISTRIBUTING AND ENFORCING THE AMENDED COUNTY JAIL ORDER AND PLAN. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 8/28/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 JOHN ARMSTRONG, et al., on behalf of themselves and as representatives of the class, 6 Plaintiffs, 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 v. ORDER DISTRIBUTING AND ENFORCING THE AMENDED COUNTY JAIL ORDER AND PLAN EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Governor of the State of California; CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION; MICHAEL MINOR, Acting Director of the Division of Juvenile Justice; MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation; JENNIFER SHAFFER, the Executive Officer of the Board of Parole Hearings; DIANA TOCHE, Acting Director of the Division of Correctional Health Care Services; CHRIS MEYER, Director of the Division of Facility Planning, Construction and Management; KATHLEEN DICKINSON, Acting Director of Adult Institutions; and ROBERT AMBROSELLI, Acting Director of Division of Adult Parole Operations, 20 21 No. C 94-2307 CW Defendants. ________________________________/ 22 Attached to this Order is the Armstrong v. Brown County Jail 23 Plan. 24 Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act (RA) against the 25 California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and 26 other State defendants, brought by prisoners and parolees with 27 mobility, sight, hearing, learning, developmental or kidney 28 disabilities that substantially limit one or more of their major Armstrong is a class action under the Americans with 1 life activities. 2 as a remedy for violations of the ADA and RA, the Court ordered 3 that CDCR develop, disseminate, and implement a plan for 4 accommodation of disabled parolees and out-to-court prisoners 5 housed in county jails. 6 On January 13, 2012 and again on April 11, 2012, Defendants’ appeal of the April 11, 2012 order is currently 7 pending before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. 8 take the position that the counties are solely liable for 9 providing disabled non-life parolees with accommodations legally Defendants United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 mandated by the ADA and RA and that the State has no joint 11 responsibility for this. 12 request to stay the April 11, 2012 order during the appeal and has 13 ordered that, while their appeal is pending, Defendants are 14 required to comply with the County Jail Plan that they developed 15 in conjunction with Plaintiffs’ counsel. 16 of Appeals has denied a stay of this Court’s April 11, 2012 order. This Court has denied Defendants’ The Ninth Circuit Court 17 Attached to this Order is the County Jail Plan, which 18 supersedes the draft plans that were distributed to the counties 19 on February 27, 2012 and July 12, 2012. 20 The County Jail Plan’s requirements include the following, 21 among others: 22 (1) On or before September 1, 2012, CDCR will send an email 23 notification to each county’s legal counsel or designee 24 identifying each parolee with a disability, including those 25 subject to California Penal Code section 3056, being held in that 26 county’s jail facilities on that date. 27 2012, CDCR will send email notifications once per day to each 28 county’s legal counsel or designee identifying each parolee with a 2 Beginning on September 1, 1 disability booked in that county’s jail facilities over the past 2 24 hours. 3 CDCR identification number, and last release date from prison. 4 The notification must also include a plain-language description of 5 each parolee’s last-known disabilities and the accommodations in 6 housing or programming the parolee received as of the date he or 7 she was released from prison. 8 9 (2) The notifications must include each parolee’s name, On or before September 15, 2012, CDCR will send an email notification to each county’s legal counsel or designee United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 identifying each CDCR out-to-court prisoner with a disability 11 being held in that county’s facilities on that date. 12 September 15, 2012, CDCR will send email notifications once per 13 day to each county’s legal counsel or designee identifying each 14 CDCR out-to-court prisoner with a disability sent to that county’s 15 facilities in the past 24 hours. 16 each CDCR out-to-court prisoner’s name and CDCR identification 17 number. 18 description of the out-to-court prisoner’s last-known disabilities 19 and the accommodations in housing or programming the prisoner 20 received as of the date he or she was transferred from a prison. 21 (3) Beginning on The notification will include The notification will also include a plain-language Beginning on September 15, 2012, CDCR shall provide CDCR 22 grievance forms and stamped envelopes addressed to CDCR to all 23 parolees and out-to-court prisoners with disabilities housed in 24 county jails. 25 the grievance forms to CDCR through the standard mail. 26 personnel will encourage parolees and out-to-court prisoners also 27 to use the county jail’s grievance process to request disability 28 accommodations. The parolees and out-to-court prisoners can send CDCR Whenever CDCR personnel receive a completed 3 1 grievance form from a parolee or out-to-court prisoner in county 2 jail, they shall forward the grievance form to the county’s legal 3 counsel or designee as soon as possible and no later than three 4 business days after receipt. 5 within the timeframes set forth in the County Jail Plan and may 6 contact counties to request information for a response. 7 (4) CDCR shall respond to the grievances Beginning no later than September 15, 2012, if CDCR 8 personnel become aware that an out-to-court prisoner or parolee 9 with a disability faces an urgent or emergency situation (for United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 example, if there is an allegation of a condition that is a threat 11 to the individual’s health or safety or that would prevent his or 12 her participation or effective communication in a parole 13 revocation proceeding), CDCR will notify the county’s designee or 14 legal counsel immediately. 15 CDCR will implement all remaining provisions of the County 16 Jail Plan by September 15, 2012. 17 limited to, the requirements that CDCR must review and respond to 18 grievances it receives from class members, promptly share 19 grievances with county officials, review grievances to identify 20 patterns of denials of disability accommodations, and investigate 21 any such patterns identified. 22 This includes, but is not Any questions about the information received from CDCR may be 23 directed to the following email address: 24 Armstrongteam@cdcr.ca.gov. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: 8/28/2012 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?