Vanyi et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al

Filing 18

MDL ORDER (CTO-86) TRANSFERRING CASE to Northern Texas. Signed by Jeffrey N. Luthi on 8/7/2012. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2012)

Download PDF
Case 3:11-md-02244-K 2244 DocumentFiled 08/07/12 Page Page 1 PageID 2064 Case MDL No. Document 184 736 Filed 08/07/12 1 of 2 of 2 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL By s/*PAIGE LESSOR on DEPUTY CLERK MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS August 07, 2012 IN RE: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., PINNACLE HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2244 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −86) On May 23, 2011, the Panel transferred 3 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407. See 787 F.Supp.2d 1358 (J.P.M.L. 2011). Since that time, 509 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Texas. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable James Edgar Kinkeade. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Texas and assigned to Judge Kinkeade. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the Northern District of Texas for the reasons stated in the order of May 23, 2011, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable James Edgar Kinkeade. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Aug 07, 2012 Case 3:11-md-02244-K 2244 DocumentFiled 08/07/12 Page Page 2 PageID 2065 Case MDL No. Document 184 736 Filed 08/07/12 2 of 2 of 2 IN RE: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., PINNACLE HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2244 SCHEDULE CTO−86 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 2 12−05865 CAC 2 12−05893 CAC CAC 2 2 12−05897 12−06040 Norman Carrier et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al Olando Allen Donehue v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al Edgar Sharp v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al Searcy Giles et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 12−03535 Vanyi et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al 12−00380 Caiazzo v. Depuy Orthopedics, Inc. et al FLORIDA MIDDLE FLM 2 FLORIDA SOUTHERN FLS 9 12−80710 Christie v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al 12−02112 Flach et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al MARYLAND MD 1 MICHIGAN EASTERN MIE 2 12−13048 Faulkner v. DePuy, Inc. et al 12−01803 Bryant v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al MINNESOTA MN 0 NEW YORK SOUTHERN NYS 1 12−05065 Kaufman v. Depuy Othopaedics, Inc. et al Opposed 08/06/12

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?