Agardi v. City and County of San Francisco
Filing
8
ORDER RE 7 GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference set for 11/1/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/20/12. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961
Chief Trial Attorney
TERESA TAN, State Bar #58440
Deputy City Attorney
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone:
(415) 554-4272
Facsimile:
(415) 554-3837
Email:
teresa.tan@sfgov.org
7
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
JULIANNA AGARDI,
14
Plaintiff,
15
vs.
16
17
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO,
Defendant.
Case No. 12-cv-3475 RS
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND
CONTINUANCE OF THE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Trial Date:
Not Set
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
The Court having considered the submissions, and good cause having been shown,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Administrative Motion For Order Granting
Defendant an extension of time in which to respond to plaintiff's complaint is granted.
Defendant shall file a response to plaintiff's complaint on or before October 19, 2012. The
Case Management conference shall be continued until [January 15, 2013]. November 1, 2012 at 10:00 a.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
DATED: 8/20/12
THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
28
Order Granting Deft's Admin Mtn for Extension,
Agardi v. CCSF; Case No. 12-cv-3475 RS
1
n:\lit\li2012\130102\00791895.doc
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
