Evans v. Carrows Restaurants Inc. et al

Filing 8

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF DFT BERETTA INVESTMENT GROUP'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - to 8/20/12. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/1/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-03452-JCS Document6 Filed07/31/12 Page1 of 3 5 Paul Kozachenko, Esq., SBN: 104601 paulk@gkfremontlaw.com Selena P. Ontiveros, Esq., SBN: 211790 selenao@gkfremontlaw.com GONSALVES & KOZACHENKO 1133 Auburn Street Fremont, CA 94538 Telephone: (510) 770-3900 Facsimile: (510) 657-9876 6 Attorneys for Defendant Beretta Investment Group 1 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 Janice Evans, 13 14 15 16 17 Case No. CV12-03452 JCS Plaintiff, v. Carrows Restaurants Inc., Beretta Investment Group, a California General Partnership, STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF DEFENDANT BERETTA INVESTMENT GROUP’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Dept: Judge: Courtroom G Joseph C. Spero Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case3:12-cv-03452-JCS Document6 Filed07/31/12 Page2 of 3 1 Plaintiff Janice Evans (“Plaintiff”), on the one hand, and Defendant Beretta Investment 2 Group (“Defendant,” and together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), on the other hand, through their 3 respective counsel, HEREBY STIPULATE and AGREE as follows: 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its Complaint against Defendant (“Complaint”) in the Northern 5 District of California on July 2, 2012. 6 Defendant’s response to the Complaint is due on August 2, 2012; Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e), 7 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that additional time is necessary to allow Defendant to 8 evaluate the Complaint and its response and therefore agree to an extension for Defendant to 9 respond to the Complaint, from August 2, 2012 to August 20, 2012; 10 WHEREAS, this extension will not alter or affect any date previously set by the Court; 11 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties have agreed and stipulated, through their respective 12 13 14 counsel of record, that: Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint shall be continued until August 20, 2012. 15 16 Dated: July 30, 2012 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 17 By: ______/s/ Tanya E. Moore_____________ TANYA E. MOORE Attorneys for Plaintiff Janice Evans 18 19 20 Dated: July 30, 2012 GONSALVES & KOZACHENKO 21 22 23 24 By: /s/ Selena P. Ontiveros SELENA P. ONTIVEROS Attorneys for Defendant Beretta Investment Group 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case3:12-cv-03452-JCS Document6 Filed07/31/12 Page3 of 3 1 2 Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory. 3 Respectfully submitted, Dated: July 31, 2012 5 /s/ Selena P. Ontiveros Selena P. Ontiveros 6 10 S Dated: Aug. 1, 2012 UNIT ED 9 O ORD IT IS S RT U O 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA ERED 11 LI ER A H 14 RT 13 pero S seph C. Judge Jo NO 12 R NIA 7 FO 4 N F D IS T IC T O R C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?