Evans v. Carrows Restaurants Inc. et al
Filing
8
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF DFT BERETTA INVESTMENT GROUP'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - to 8/20/12. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/1/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2012)
Case3:12-cv-03452-JCS Document6 Filed07/31/12 Page1 of 3
5
Paul Kozachenko, Esq., SBN: 104601
paulk@gkfremontlaw.com
Selena P. Ontiveros, Esq., SBN: 211790
selenao@gkfremontlaw.com
GONSALVES & KOZACHENKO
1133 Auburn Street
Fremont, CA 94538
Telephone: (510) 770-3900
Facsimile: (510) 657-9876
6
Attorneys for Defendant Beretta Investment Group
1
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
Janice Evans,
13
14
15
16
17
Case No. CV12-03452 JCS
Plaintiff,
v.
Carrows Restaurants Inc., Beretta Investment
Group, a California General Partnership,
STIPULATION REGARDING
CONTINUANCE OF DEFENDANT
BERETTA INVESTMENT GROUP’S
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Dept:
Judge:
Courtroom G
Joseph C. Spero
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case3:12-cv-03452-JCS Document6 Filed07/31/12 Page2 of 3
1
Plaintiff Janice Evans (“Plaintiff”), on the one hand, and Defendant Beretta Investment
2
Group (“Defendant,” and together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), on the other hand, through their
3
respective counsel, HEREBY STIPULATE and AGREE as follows:
4
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its Complaint against Defendant (“Complaint”) in the Northern
5
District of California on July 2, 2012.
6
Defendant’s response to the Complaint is due on August 2, 2012;
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e),
7
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that additional time is necessary to allow Defendant to
8
evaluate the Complaint and its response and therefore agree to an extension for Defendant to
9
respond to the Complaint, from August 2, 2012 to August 20, 2012;
10
WHEREAS, this extension will not alter or affect any date previously set by the Court;
11
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties have agreed and stipulated, through their respective
12
13
14
counsel of record, that:
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint shall be
continued until August 20, 2012.
15
16
Dated: July 30, 2012
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
17
By: ______/s/ Tanya E. Moore_____________
TANYA E. MOORE
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Janice Evans
18
19
20
Dated: July 30, 2012
GONSALVES & KOZACHENKO
21
22
23
24
By:
/s/ Selena P. Ontiveros
SELENA P. ONTIVEROS
Attorneys for Defendant
Beretta Investment Group
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case3:12-cv-03452-JCS Document6 Filed07/31/12 Page3 of 3
1
2
Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I attest under penalty of perjury that
concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory.
3
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: July 31, 2012
5
/s/ Selena P. Ontiveros
Selena P. Ontiveros
6
10
S
Dated: Aug. 1, 2012
UNIT
ED
9
O ORD
IT IS S
RT
U
O
8
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
ERED
11
LI
ER
A
H
14
RT
13
pero
S
seph C.
Judge Jo
NO
12
R NIA
7
FO
4
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?