Hicks et al v. Facebook Inc. et al
Filing
33
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS; DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 23, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
KEVIN HICKS, et al.,
No. C-12-3353 MMC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS;
DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO
REMAND
v.
11
FACEBOOK, INC., et al.,
12
Defendants.
/
13
14
Before the Court are plaintiffs’ motion to remand, filed July 19, 2012, and
15
defendants’ motion for a stay of proceedings, filed July 6, 2012 and amended July 19,
16
2012.
17
By order filed July 24, 2012, the Court approved the parties’ stipulation that the
18
Court’s disposition of remand and stay motions filed in seven specified related actions
19
would be “dispositive and dictate the outcome of the remand and stay motions” filed in the
20
above-titled action. (See Order, filed July 24, 2012.) By separate order filed this date in
21
each of the seven specified actions, the Court has denied the remand and stay motions
22
filed therein. See, e.g., Lazar v. Facebook, Inc., C 12-3195 MMC.
23
24
25
Accordingly, defendant’s motion for a stay of proceedings is hereby DENIED, and
plaintiffs’ motion to remand is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: August 23, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
