Cuviello et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 16 TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT filed by N. Yu, J. Mitra, City and County of San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/1/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
DANNY CHOU, State Bar # 180240
Chief of Complex and Special Litigation
ROBERT A. BONTA, State Bar # 202668
AILEEN M. McGRATH, State Bar # 280846
Deputy City Attorneys
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, Seventh Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone:
(415) 554-4236
Facsimile:
(415) 554-3837
E-Mail:
aileen.mcgrath@sfgov.org
8
9
10
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICER N. YU, SAN
FRANCISCO PARK RANGER J. MITRA
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
JOSEPH P. CUVIELLO, DENIZ
BOLBOL, AND ALEX FELSINGER,
individually,
Action filed: June 12, 2012
Plaintiffs,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Case No. CV 12-3034 EMC
vs.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO
RECREATION AND PARK
DEPARTMENT, SAN FRANCISCO
POLICE OFFICER N. YU, SAN
FRANCISCO PARK RANGER J.
MITRA and DOES 1-20, in their
individual and official capacities, Jointly
and Severally,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
(Civil L.R. 6-1(a))
Trial Date: None Set
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order
USDC No. CV 12 3034 EMC
1
c:\documents and settings\cdaly\desktop\cuviello stip re
answer.doc
1
2
STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiffs Joseph P. Cuviello, Deniz Bolbol, and Alex Felsinger
3
("Plaintiffs") and Defendants City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Officer Nelson
4
Yu, and San Francisco Park Ranger Jose Mitra ("Defendants"), by and through their respective
5
counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the
6
Complaint be extended by 30 days, to and including September 7, 2012.
7
Dated: July 30, 2012
8
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
DANNY CHOU
Chief of Complex and Special Litigation
ROBERT A. BONTA
AILEEN M. McGRATH
Deputy City Attorneys
9
10
11
12
By:
13
/s/ Aileen M. McGrath
AILEEN M. McGRATH
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN
FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICER N. YU, SAN
FRANCISCO PARK RANGER J. MITRA
14
15
16
17
18
Dated: July 30, 2012
19
LAW OFFICE OF TRENT J. THORNLEY
20
By:
21
22
/s/ Trent J. Thornley
TRENT J. THORNLEY
Attorney for Plaintiff DENIZ BOLBOL
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order
USDC No. CV 12 3034 EMC
2
c:\documents and settings\cdaly\desktop\cuviello stip re
answer.doc
1
2
3
4
Date: July 30, 2012
MATT SPRINGMAN
5
6
7
/s/ Matt Springman
MATT SPRINGMAN
8
Attorney for Plaintiff DENIZ BOLBOL
9
By:
Dated: July 30, 2012
10
GONZALEZ & LEIGH LLP
11
By:
12
13
/s/ G. Whitney Leigh
G. WHITNEY LEIGH
Attorney for Plaintiff ALEX FELSINGER
14
15
Dated: July 30, 2012
16
JOSEPH P. CUVIELLO
17
18
By:
19
/s/ Joseph Cuviello
JOSEPH P. CUVIELLO
Plaintiff In Pro Se
20
21
22
*THE FILER OF THIS DOCUMENT ATTESTS THAT CONCURRENCE IN THE FILING OF
THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM ALL SIGNATORIES
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order
USDC No. CV 12 3034 EMC
3
c:\documents and settings\cdaly\desktop\cuviello stip re
answer.doc
ORDER
1
2
The time for Defendants City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Officer
3
Nelson Yu, and San Francisco Park Ranger Jose Mitra to answer or otherwise respond to the
4
Complaint is extended by 30 days, to and including September 7, 2012.
S
UNIT
ED
D
RDERE
EDWARD IT IS SO O
M. CHEN
United States District Judge
8
dward
Judge E
NO
9
RT
ER
11
12
A
H
10
n
M. Che
LI
7
R NIA
DATED:
RT
U
O
6
8/1/12
FO
5
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order
USDC No. CV 12 3034 EMC
4
c:\documents and settings\cdaly\desktop\cuviello stip re
answer.doc
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
