Vanity.com, Inc. v. Vanity Shop of Grand Forks, Inc.
Filing
16
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 8/17/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
VANITY.COM, INC.,
No. C 12-2912 SI
7
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
v.
VANITY SHOP OF GRAND FORKS, INC.,
Defendant.
/
12
13
On August 2, 2012, defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for lack of personal
14
jurisdiction, or in the alternative, to transfer venue. Dkt. 7. A hearing on the motion is scheduled for
15
September 14, 2012. Pursuant to Civ. L. R. 7-3, plaintiff’s opposition was due on August 16, 2012. On
16
August 16, 2012, rather than filing an opposition, plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. Defendant has
17
informed the Court via telephone message that its motion to dismiss is unaffected by the Amended
18
Complaint and that it wants its motion heard as scheduled.
19
The Court considers the Amended Complaint the operative complaint in this case. As defendant
20
has informed the Court that its currently filed motion to dismiss applies to the Amended Complaint, the
21
hearing will remain on as scheduled. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss no later
22
than August 24, 2012. A reply shall be filed by August 31, 2012.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: August 17, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
