EMC Corporation v. Bright Response, LLC
Filing
41
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Briefing Schedule of Defendant's Motions to Dismiss and/or Transfer, 23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , 25 MOTION to Dismiss or Transfer in Fa vor of First-Filed Action, 30 MOTION for Discovery EMC's Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery to Respond to Defendant's Motions to Dismiss and/or Transfer., STIPULATION AND ORDER Responses due by 8/21/2012. Replies due by 8/28/2012. Motion Hearing set for 9/14/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/13/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2012)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (CA Bar No. 170151)
2
Antonio R. Sistos (CA Bar No. 238847)
Emily C. O’Brien (CA Bar No. 240072)
3
Andrew M. Holmes (CA Bar No. 260475)
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
4
San Francisco, California 94111
5 Telephone:
(415) 875-6600
Facsimile:
(415) 875-6700
6 Email:
charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
antoniosistos@quinnemanuel.com
7
emilyobrien@quinnemanuel.com
drewholmes@quinnemanuel.com
8
9 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Patrick Curran (Pro Hac Vice)
10 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
11 New York, NY 10010
Telephone:
(212) 849-7000
(212) 849-7100
12 Facsimile:
Email:
patrickcurran@quinnemanuel.com
13
[Additional Counsel Listed on Complaint]
14
15 Attorneys for Plaintiff EMC Corporation
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19
20
CASE NO. 3:12-cv-02841-EMC
EMC CORPORATION,
21
Plaintiff,
22
23
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS
AND/OR TRANSFER
vs.
[L.R. 6-1, 6-2, 7-12]
24 BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC,
25 Defendant.
26
27
28
02961.62479/4903591.1
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 3:12-cv-02841-EMC
1
Pursuant to this Court’s Order (Dkt. No. 39) and Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12,
2 EMC Corporation (“EMC”) and Bright Response, LLC (“Bright Response,” and together with
3 EMC the “Parties”) respectfully declare and stipulate to continue the briefing schedule for Bright
4 Response’s motions to dismiss and/or transfer (Dkt. Nos. 23 and 25) as follows:
5
1. The due date for EMC’s Oppositions to the Bright Response motions to
6
dismiss and/or transfer (Dkt. Nos. 23 and 25) is continued from August 14,
7
2012 to no later than August 21, 2012.
8
2. The due date for Bright Response’s Replies in support of its motions to
9
dismiss and/or transfer (Dkt. Nos. 23 and 25) is continued from August 21,
2012 to no later than August 28, 2012.
10
11
The purpose for the extensions of time is to allow EMC to investigate the issues and
12 allegations raised in Bright Response’s motions. In accordance with Civil Local Rule 6-2(a)(2),
13 the only time modifications to the case thus far have been two stipulated extensions of time for
14 Bright Response to respond to the complaint. (Dkt. Nos. 12 and 17.) In accordance with Civil
15 Local Rule 6-2(a)(3), the Parties do not believe that the requested time modifications will have any
16 impact on the case schedule as one has not yet been set.
17
SO STIPULATED:
18
19
DATED: August 10, 2012
20
21
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
22
By /s/ Andrew M. Holmes
Andrew M. Holmes
23
Attorneys for Plaintiff EMC Corporation
24
DATED: August 10, 2012
BLACK CHANG & HAMILL LLP
25
26
By /s/ Bradford J. Black
Bradford J. Black
27
Attorneys for Defendant Bright Response, LLC
28
02961.62479/4903591.1
2
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 3:12-cv-02841-EMC
1
2
ATTESTATION
I, Andrew M. Holmes, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has
3 been obtained from Bradford J. Black, counsel for Bright Response, LLC. I declare under penalty
4 of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
5
Executed this 10th day of August, 2012 in San Francisco, California.
6
By /s/ Andrew M. Holmes
Andrew M. Holmes
7
8
9
10
12
8/13/12
DATED: ______________________
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
_____________________________
ED
United States District JudgeSO ORDER
RT
16
18
R NIA
dwa
Judge E
ER
A
H
17
hen
rd M. C
NO
15
FO
14
IT IS
LI
13
UNIT
ED
S
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
U
O
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02961.62479/4903591.1
3
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 3:12-cv-02841-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?