Leon et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
Filing
18
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 8/10/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
DANNY LEON and CRISTINA LEON,
9
Plaintiffs,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
No. C 12-2824 SI
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
v.
CITIMORTGAGE, INC, CR TITLE
SERVICES, and DOES 1 through 10,
Defendants.
13
/
14
On May 4, 2012, plaintiffs filed this foreclosure-related action against defendants Citimortgage,
15
Inc. and CR Title Services in Alameda Superior Court. On June 1, 2012, defendants removed the case
16
to this Court. On June 8, 2012, defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to
17
state a claim. On June 18, 2012, the Court referred this case to the Alternative Dispute Resolution
18
(ADR) Unit for a telephone conference to assess this case’s suitability for mediation or a settlement
19
conference. The Court vacated the defendant’s motion to dismiss while the case was discussed in ADR.
20
On August 6, 2012, defendant Citimortgage filed an Ex Parte Applicaiton for Order Dismissing
21
Action For Failure to Prosecute. Defendant informs the Court that plaintiffs did not appear at the ADR
22
telephone conference. Defendant further informs the Court that plaintiff’s counsel has been suspended
23
from the practice of law since June 21, 2012. See Def.’s Ex Parte Application, Ex. 1. Plaintiffs have
24
not filed any opposition to defendant’s application or motion to dismiss, or contacted this Court in any
25
other way.
26
Accordingly, plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by August 17, 2012,
27
why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Failure to
28
1
comply with this deadlines will result in the dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice.
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: August 10, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?