Azzolino v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Filing
14
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER. Case referred to mediation. Further Case Management Conference set for 3/14/2013 10:00 AM; Pretrial Conference set for 12/19/2013 10:00 AM; Jury Selection set for 1/13/2014 09:00 AM; Jury Trial set for 1/13/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/30/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
7
8
RICHARD AZZOLINO,
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
No. C 12-02618 RS
CASE MANAGEMENT
SCHEDULING ORDER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a Case
15
Management Conference on August 30, 2012. After considering the Joint Case Management
16
Statement submitted by the parties and consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and
17
good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
18
1.
19
MEDIATION. This matter is referred to mediation to be completed within 120 days of the
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION.
20
issuance of this order. The parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case is resolved at
21
the mediation.
22
2.
DISCOVERY. On or before February 28, 2013, all non-expert discovery shall be
23
completed by the parties. Discovery shall be limited as follows: (a) ten (10) non-expert depositions
24
per party; (b) thirty-five (35) interrogatories per party, including all discrete subparts; (c) a
25
reasonable number of requests for production of documents or for inspection per party; and (d) a
26
reasonable number of requests for admission per party.
27
28
3. EXPERT WITNESSES. The disclosure and discovery of expert witness opinions shall
proceed as follows:
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
A. On or before April 12, 2013, plaintiff shall disclose expert testimony reports in
accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).
B. On or before April 26, 2013, defendant shall disclose expert testimony and reports in
accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).
C. On or before June 28, 2013, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) shall be completed.
4.
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. A Further Case Management
8
Conference shall be held on March 14, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United
9
States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. The parties shall file a
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
Joint Case Management Statement at least one week prior to the Conference.
5.
PRETRIAL MOTIONS. All pretrial motions must be filed and served pursuant to
Civil Local Rule 7. All pretrial motions shall be heard no later than September 12, 2013.
6.
PRETRIAL STATEMENTS. At a time convenient to both, counsel shall meet and
14
confer to discuss preparation of a joint pretrial statement, and on or before December 5, 2013,
15
counsel shall file a Joint Pretrial Statement.
16
7.
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. The final pretrial conference will be held on
17
December 19, 2013 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450
18
Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. Each party or lead counsel who will try the case
19
shall attend personally.
20
8.
TRIAL DATE. Trial shall commence on January 13, 2014 at 9:00 a.m., in
21
Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,
22
California.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 8/30/12
_______________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
25
26
27
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
