Cobb v. Office of Assessor, County of Alameda
Filing
13
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley dismissing 12 Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
CHRISTOPHER ALAN COBB,
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No.: C12-2569 JSC
ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT
(Dkt. No. 12)
15
16
17
OFFICE OF ASSESSOR, COUNTY OF
ALAMEDA,
Defendant.
18
19
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this real estate action against the Office of Assessor
20
in Alameda County, which the Court dismissed for failure to state a claim on June 11, 2012.
21
(Dkt. No. 9.) The Court is now in receipt of Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss this action filed on
22
August 17, 2012, which states that “Plaintiff, UNDER SEAL, request [sic] that case #CV 12-
23
04316 be dismiss [sic] due to procedural defects.” (Dkt. No. 12.) The caption of the motion
24
refers to Docket No. 12-2569. Plaintiff lists the party names as “Under Seal, Plaintiff” and
25
“Under Seal, Defendant.” (Id.) Nothing was previously filed under seal in this case, and it is
26
unclear why Plaintiff states otherwise. Given the lack of party names and the two conflicting
27
docket numbers, it is possible that Plaintiff meant to file this motion in another action. The
28
Court cannot, however, identify a case in this district with Docket No. 12-04316. As such, the
1
Court assumes that Plaintiff’s motion relates to Docket No. 12-2569 as listed in his heading.
2
Since this case was already dismissed, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED as moot.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: August 20, 2012
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
