Bindal v. Department of Homeland Security et al
Filing
12
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 11 Stipulation To Extend Time. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2012)
<![CDATA[
Case3:12-cv-02010-MEJ Document11 Filed08/03/12 Page1 of 2
4
Jennifer Chang (CA 271523)
Law Office of Mei F. Chen
96 N. 3rd Street, Suite 150
San Jose, CA 95112
Tel: (408) 292-2174
Fax: (408) 343-7936
jennifer@jenniferchanglaw.com
5
Attorney for Plaintiff
1
2
3
NON-DETAINED
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN FRANCSICO DIVISION
9
10
AMIT BINDAL,
11
12
13
14
15
)
)
)
v.
)
)
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
)
SECURITY, et al,
)
Defendants
)
____________________________________)
FILE NO.: CV 12-2010 MEJ
INS NO.: A058-714-988
Plaintiff
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
16
STIPULATION
17
Amit Bindal and the Defendant, Department of Homeland Security et al, through their
18
19
20
respective attorneys, hereby agree and stipulate to continue the hearing for Defendant’s Motion
to Remand from August 30, 2012 to October 11, 2012. The continuance is necessary to allow
21
Plaintiff’s Counsel time to review the record and respond to Defendant’s motion given her recent
22
substitution into this case. The parties further agree that Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s
23
Motion to Remand shall be due September 17, 2012, and Defendant’s Reply shall be due
24
September 24, 2012.
25
Respectfully submitted,
1
Case3:12-cv-02010-MEJ Document11 Filed08/03/12 Page2 of 2
1
2
/s/ Jennifer Chang__________
Jennifer Chang
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: August 2, 2012
/s/ Ila C. Deiss_______________
Ila C. Deiss, Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorney for Defendants
Dated: August 2, 2012
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
[PROPOSED] ORDER
10
11
12
Having reviewed and considered the Stipulation for Extension of Time, and good cause
appearing, the Court hereby orders:
13
1) Plaintiff’s Response to Motion to Remand is due September 17, 2012.
14
2) Defendant’s Reply to Motion to Remand is due September 24, 2012.
15
3) The hearing on the Motion to Remand shall be set for October 11, 2012 .
16
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
UNIT
ED
RT
21
Ju
ER
23
24
25
2
A
H
22
s
na Jame
ria-Ele
dge Ma
NO
20
FO
19
R NIA
Maria-Elena James
United States District Chief Magistrate Judge
LI
18
August 6
Dated: ________________, 2012
RT
U
O
17
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
_____________________________
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
