Flatworld Interactives LLC v. Apple Inc.
Filing
26
ORDER GRANTING 25 STIPULATION Requesting Leave for Flatworld to File Answer to Counterclaim. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/21/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2012)
<![CDATA[
Case3:12-cv-01956-JSW Document25 Filed08/17/12 Page1 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Jeff D. Friedman (173886)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: (510) 725-3000
Facsimile: (510) 725-3001
jefff@hbsslaw.com
Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice)
Mark S. Carlson (Pro Hac Vice)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1918 Eighth Avenue
Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: (206) 623-7292
Facsimile: (206) 623-0594
steve@hbsslaw.com
markc@hbsslaw.com
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FlatWorld Interactives LLC
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
FLATWORLD INTERACTIVES LLC, a
Pennsylvania limited liability company,
16
Plaintiff,
17
v.
18
APPLE INC, a California corporation,
19
Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM – Case No. CV-12-1956 JSC
005012-11 545888 V1
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 12-01956 JSW
STIPULATION REQUESTING
LEAVE FOR FLATWORLD TO FILE
ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM
OUT OF TIME PURSUANT TO L.R.
6-1(b) AND 6-2 AND PROPOSED
FORM OF ORDER
JURY TRIAL REQUESTED
Case3:12-cv-01956-JSW Document25 Filed08/17/12 Page2 of 5
1
2
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b) and L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff FlatWorld Interactives LLC
(“FlatWorld”) and Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Apple”), hereby stipulate as follows:
3
1. WHEREAS, Apple served its Answer and Counterclaims on June 11, 2012;
4
2. WHEREAS, FlatWorld’s answer to Apple’s counterclaims was due on July 3, 2012;
5
3. WHEREAS, FlatWorld missed this deadline through an unintentional clerical
6
7
scheduling error and there has been no prejudice to Apple;
4. WHEREAS, an order permitting FlatWorld to file its answer to Apple’s counterclaims
8
out of time will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court
9
order; and
10
11
12
5. WHEREAS, Apple does not object to FlatWorld’s filing its answer to Apple’s
counterclaims out of time;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel-of-record, hereby
13
request that the Court enter an order permitting FlatWorld to file its answer to Apple’s
14
counterclaims.
15
SO STIPULATED:
16
DATED: August 17, 2012
17
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
By /s/ Steve W. Berman
Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice)
18
Mark S. Carlson (Pro Hac Vice)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: (206) 623-7292
Facsimile: (206) 623-0594
steve@hbsslaw.com
markc@hbsslaw.com
19
20
21
22
23
Jeff D. Friedman (173886)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: (510) 725-3000
Facsimile: (510) 725-3001
jefff@hbsslaw.com
24
25
26
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FlatWorld Interactives LLC
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM – Case No. CV-12-1956 JSC
005012-11 545888 V1
-1-
Case3:12-cv-01956-JSW Document25 Filed08/17/12 Page3 of 5
1
2
DATED: August 17, 2012
BRIDGES & MAVRAKAKIS LLP
3
By /s/ Michael T. Pieja
4
Kenneth H. Bridges (SBN 243541)
Michael T. Pieja (SBN 250351)
BRIDGES & MAVRAKAKIS LLP
3000 El Camino Real
One Palo Alto Square, 2nd Floor
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Telephone: (650) 804-7800
Facsimile: (650) 852-9224
kbridges@bridgesmav.com
mpieja@bridgesmav.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
Aaron Taggart (SBN 258287)
ataggart@bridgesmav.com
BRIDGES & MAVRAKAKIS LLP
200 South Wacker Dr., Suite 3080
Chicago, IL 60606
Telephone: (312) 789-4936
11
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant
Apple Inc.
14
15
16
17
18
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
DATED this ____ day of August, 2012.
19
___________________________________
THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM – Case No. CV-12-1956 JSC
005012-11 545888 V1
-2-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
