Ganesan v. GMAC Mortgage LLC et al
Filing
11
ORDER re 10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Bankrupt Defendant GMAC Mortgage, LLC, Only, filed by Skandapriya Ganesan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 8/16/2012. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
Michael Yesk (SB#130056)
70 Doray Drive, Suite 16
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
925-849-5525
yesklaw@gmail.com
Attorney for Plaintiffs
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
SKANDAPRIYA GANESAN,
14
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC; MORTGAGE
)
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,
)
INC.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
)
INCLUSIVE,
)
Defendants
)
_____________________________________ )
15
TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THIS HONORABLE COURT:
8
9
10
11
12
13
Case: 3:12-cv-01935-MEJ
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF
BANKRUPT DEFENDANT GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
ONLY; [Proposed] ORDER
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i)
16
Plaintiff SKANDAPRIYA GANESAN hereby requests that the Complaint as
17
against Defendant Debtor GMAC Mortgage, LLC, be dismissed without prejudice,
18
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), prior to the filing of an Answer
19
or Motion for Summary Judgment, each party to bear its own costs and fees.
20
21
22
Dated: August 16, 2012
Yesk Law
23
24
/s/ Michael Yesk
_____________________________________
Michael Yesk, Attorney for Plaintiff
25
26
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC ONLY [Proposed] ORDER
- 1
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Based on the Plaintiffs' request pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and good cause
appearing,
3
IT IS ORDERED that:
4
The case is dismissed as against Defendant GMAC Mortgage, LLC ONLY, without
5
prejudice, each side to bear its own costs and fees.
6
7
8
16
Dated: August ____, 2012
Honorable Maria-Elena James
Chief Magistrate Judge of the United States District Court,
Northern District of California
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC ONLY [Proposed] ORDER
- 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
