Mondragon et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank et al
Filing
26
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE re 21 Order. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 9, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
MIRSHA-SHARONE MONDRAGON and
DAVID-WYNN MILLER,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
No. C 12-01878 WHA
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
v.
15
J.P. MORGAN CHASE, CALIFORNIA
RECONVEYANCE CO., and FIRST
AMERICAN TITLE,
16
Defendants.
14
/
17
18
By order dated June 12, 2012, plaintiffs were ordered to provide a more definite
19
statement on the grounds that their complaint was utterly unintelligible. A more definite
20
statement was due July 2. Due to a clerical error, the June 12 order was only served on plaintiff
21
Mirsha-Sharone Mondragon. Another order issued on June 25, 2012, after plaintiffs failed to
22
timely respond to defendant First American Title Company’s motion to dismiss. That order
23
required plaintiffs to show cause by July 16, why the action should not be dismissed for failure
24
to prosecute; the order also extended the deadline for plaintiffs to submit a more definite
25
statement from July 2, to July 16. Unfortunately, due to another clerical error, the June 25 order
26
was only served on plaintiff Mondragon. Another order issued on July 9, 2012, extending the
27
deadline to respond to the June 25 order to show cause from July 16, to July 30. That order was
28
1
served on both plaintiffs. Plaintiffs failed to timely respond. This action is DISMISSED for
2
failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The CLERK shall close the
3
case file.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: August 9, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
