Twitter, Inc. v. Skootle Corp. et al
Filing
58
ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting 55 Stipulation selecting Mediation. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2012)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TWITTER, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
CASE NO. 3:12-cv-1721 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
SKOOTLE CORP., a Tennessee corporation;
and JAMES KESTER, an individual,
Defendants.
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
☐
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
☐
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Private Process:
☐
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
☐
the presumptive deadline
other requested deadline
30 days after close of discovery
Dated: August 6, 2012
/s Charles T. Graves
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: August 9, 2012
/s Douglas Woodruff Colt
Attorney for Defendants
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
U
O
R NIA
THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
S
NO
ston
usan Ill
H
LI
RT
ER
FO
Judge S
A
Dated: 08/13/2012
S DISTRICT
TE
C
__________________________________
TA
UNIT
ED
☐
☐
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
