Riviore v. Astrue
Filing
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 15 for Extension of Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Tammie L. Riviore. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/17/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2012)
<![CDATA[
Case3:12-cv-01461-EMC Document15 Filed08/17/12 Page1 of 2
1
HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488)
2
3
4
5
1055 Lincoln Avenue
Post Office Box 5025
San Jose, California 95150-5025
Telephone: (408) 295-7755
Facsimile: (408) 295-7444
6
7
Attorney for Plaintiff
8
/jgl
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
15
TAMMIE L. RIVIORE,
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner,
Social Security Administration,
20
21
Defendant.
) Case No: 3:12-cv-01461-EMC
)
)
)
) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
22
23
Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff
24
shall have a first extension of time of (30) days up through and including Wednesday, September
25
19, 2012 in which to e-file her Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is necessitated by
26
the number of cases (3) the firm presently has pending before this and other district courts that
27
require briefing.
28
Case3:12-cv-01461-EMC Document15 Filed08/17/12 Page2 of 2
MELINDA L. HAAG
United States Attorney
1
2
3
Dated: August 17, 2012
/s/
CAROLYN CHEN ON BEHALF OF
TOVA D. WOLKING
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Dated: August 17, 2012
/s/
HARVEY P. SACKETT
Attorney for Plaintiff
TAMMIE L. RIVIORE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
United States District Judge
17
dward
Judge E
NO
18
RT
ER
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
2
n
M. Che
H
19
R NIA
DERED
SO OR
HON.
IT IS EDWARD M. CHEN
FO
August 17, 2012
LI
16
Dated:
UNIT
ED
15
RT
U
O
14
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
13
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
