Feeney, Inc. v. The Cable Connection et al
Filing
26
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY TIMOTHY P. GETZOFF PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 10, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
FEENEY, INC.,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 3:12-CV-01374-MMC
Plaintiff,
v.
THE CABLE CONNECTION and ULTRA-TEC
CORPORATION,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF
ATTORNEY TIMOTHY P. GETZOFF
PRO HAC VICE
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
Timothy P. Getzoff, an active member in good standing of the bar of the State of
Colorado, whose business address and telephone number are:
Holland & Hart LLP
1800 Broadway, Suite 300
Boulder, Colorado 80302
Telephone: (303) 473-2734
23
24
having applied in the above entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern
25
District of California on a pro hac vice basis, representing Defendants The Cable Connection and
26
Ultra-Tec Corporation,
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PRO HAC VICE
APPLICATION OF TIMOTHY P.GETZOFF
3:12-CV-01374-MMC
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and
2
conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac
3
vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application
4
will constitute notice to the party. All future filings in this action are subject to the requirements
5
contained in Civil L.R. 5-1, Electronic Case Filing.
6
7
8
Dated:______________________
August 10, 2012
9
By: ___________________________________
Hon. Judge Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PRO HAC VICE
APPLICATION OF TIMOTHY P.GETZOFF
2
3:12-CV-01374-MMC
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
