EON Corp IP Holdings LLC v. Sensus USA Inc et al
Filing
458
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 457 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery Third Agreed Motion to Extend the Time to Serve Stoke, Inc.'s Initial Disclosures filed by EON Corp IP Holdings LLC, Stoke Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/2/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11
EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Case No. 3:12-cv-01011-EMC
v.
SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P.; ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.; BROADSOFT, INC.;
CLAVISTER AB; CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.;
MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.; MERU
NETWORKS, INC.; SERCOMM
CORPORATION; SONUS NETWORKS, INC.;
STOKE, INC.; TATARA, SYSTEMS, INC.;
HTC AMERICA, INC.; UNITED STATES
CELLULAR CORPORATION; MOTOROLA
MOBILITY HOLDINGS, INC.; MOTOROLA
SOLUTIONS, INC.; KINETO WIRELESS,
INC.; and AIRVANA, INC.,
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON THIRD
AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND THE
TIME TO SERVE STOKE, INC.’S
INITIAL DISCLOSURES
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
Defendants.
23
24
Before the Court is Defendant Stoke, Inc. and EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC’s Third
25
Agreed Motion to Extend the Time to Serve Stoke, Inc.’s Initial Disclosures. Having considered
26
the matter, the Court GRANTS the motion and extends the date for Defendant Stoke, Inc. to
27
serve its initial disclosures until and including August 6, 2012.
28
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in the Northern District of California, in San
-1-
1
2nd
Francisco, California this ___ day of August, 2012.
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
RT
7
9
R NIA
dwar
Judge E
ER
A
H
8
en
d M. Ch
NO
6
FO
5
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
LI
4
UNIT
ED
S
RT
U
O
2
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
______________________________________
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STOKE’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME
TO SERVE ITS INITIAL DISCLOSURES
Case No. 3:12-cv-1011-EMC
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
