Fazio v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al
Filing
53
ORDER extending time to respond to amended complaint re 51 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 46 Amended Complaint to Extend Time to Respond filed by Bank of America, N.A. Response due 8/29/2012 Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/3/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2012)
<![CDATA[
San Francisco, CA 94105
560 Mission Street, 25th Floor
Bryan Cave LLP
1 STEBURG LAW FIRM
Anita L. Steburg, California Bar No. 245933
2 1798 Technology Drive, Suite 258
San Jose, CA 95110
(408) 573-1122
3 Telephone:
Facsimile:
(408) 573-1126
anita@steburglawfirm.com
4 E-Mail:
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff
JAMES N. FAZIO
6
BRYAN CAVE LLP
7 C. Scott Greene, California Bar No. 277445
Bahareh Mostajelean, California Bar No. 258903
8 Gerald S. Richelson, California Bar No. 267705
560 Mission Street, 25th Floor
9 San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
(415) 675-3400
(415) 675-3434
10 Facsimile:
E-Mail:
scott.greene@bryancave.com
bahareh.mostajelean@bryancave.com
11
richelsong@bryancave.com
12
Attorneys for Defendant
13 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
JAMES N. FAZIO, an individual,
Case No. CV12-00497-CRB
17
Plaintiff,
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING
DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
18
v.
19
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
20 INC.; TRANS UNION L.L.C.; EQUIFAX
INFORMATION SERVICES, L.L.C.; BANK
21 OF AMERICA, N.A. AS SUCCESSOR BY
MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS
22 SERVICING, LP;
The Honorable Charles R. Breyer
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
January 31, 2012
Not Assigned
Defendants.
23
24
STIPULATION
25
26
27
Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“Defendant”), and Plaintiff James Fazio (“Plaintiff”),
by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1.
Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint for Violations of Fair Credit Reporting
28
SF01DOCS96465.1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME
1 Act (15 U.S.C. 1681) (“FAC”) on July 11, 2012.
2
2.
Defendant was served with the FAC electronically on the same day, thereby setting
3 the deadline to respond at July 30, 2012.
4
3.
The parties have renewed settlement possibilities as an alternative to further
5 litigation.
6
4.
In order to continue the current settlement discussions, reduce cost of litigation for
7 both parties, and potentially unburden the Court’s docket, the parties have agreed to stipulate to an
8 extension of time for Defendant to respond to the FAC. Thus, instead of responding to the FAC
9 on July 30, 2012, the parties agree that Defendant’s time to file and serve a response to the
San Francisco, CA 94105
560 Mission Street, 25th Floor
Bryan Cave LLP
10 Complaint is extended 30 days to August 29, 2012.
11
5.
The stipulation will not result in prejudice to any party and its impact on judicial
12 proceedings is not expected to be significant.
13
6.
Nothing in this stipulation shall constitute a waiver of any arguments or defenses
14 that Defendant or Plaintiff may wish to assert in their pleadings, all of which are expressly
15 reserved.
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
17 Dated: August 2, 2012
STEBURG LAW FIRM
18
19
By:
/s/ Anita Steburg
Anita Steburg
Attorney for Plaintiff
JAMES N. FAZIO
20
21
22
23 Dated: August 2, 2012
25
BRYAN CAVE LLP
C. Scott Green
Bahareh Mostajelean
Gerald S. Richelson
26
By:
24
/s/ Gerald S. Richelson
Gerald S. Richelson
Attorneys for Defendant
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
27
28
SF01DOCS96465.1
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
3
Having reviewed the stipulation of Plaintiff JAMES N. FAZIO and Defendant BANK OF
4
AMERICA, N.A. and good cause appearing, the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s
5
First Amended Complaint is extended 30 days from to August 29, 2012.
6
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
J
ER
15
A
H
14
. Breyer
arles R
udge Ch
FO
RT
San Francisco, CA 94105
12
I
NO
560 Mission Street, 25th Floor
11
LI
UNIT
ED
Judge Charles R. Breyer
United States District Court
DERED
Northern District of California
SO OR
T IS
10
Bryan Cave LLP
RT
U
O
August 3, 2012
Dated: _______________
9
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
________________________________
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SF01DOCS96465.1
R NIA
8
S
7
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
