Dawson v. Chart International, Inc.
Filing
24
ORDER signed on 8/9/12 by Judge Susan Illston granting 23 Stipulation for Dismissal (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
HUNTER PYLE, SBN 184260
MANA BARARI, SBN 275328
SUNDEEN SALINAS & PYLE
428 13th Street, 8th Floor
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 663-9240
Facsimile: (510) 663-9241
5
hpyle@ssrplaw.com; mbarari@ssrplaw.com
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Keith A. Watts, State Bar No. 208491
keith.watts@ogletreedeakins.com,
Michael J. Nader, State Bar No. 200425
michael.nader@ogletreedeakins.com
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.442.4810
Facsimile:
415.442.4870
Attorneys for Defendant
CHART INTERNATIONAL, INC.
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
DOUGLAS DAWSON,
17
18
19
20
Case No.: C12-00141
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE AND RELATED
STIPULATION PER FRCP 41(A)(2) AND
ORDER THEREON
Plaintiff,
vs.
CHART INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE PER FRCP 41(A)(2)
AND ORDER THEREON
Case No. C12-00141
-1-
STIPULATION
1
2
TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD:
3
Plaintiff DOUGLAS DAWSON, by and through his attorneys of record, hereby requests this
4
Court to dismiss this action with prejudice. Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2), Defendant CHART
5
INTERNATIONAL, INC., (“Chart”) by and through its attorneys of record, represents Chart’s non-
6
objection to Plaintiff’s request to dismiss his case with prejudice, and thus Chart hereby stipulates to the
7
same. The parties have entered into a settlement agreement that already addresses each party’s
8
obligations regarding the payment of fees and costs.
9
Dated: August 8, 2012
SUNDEEN SALINAS & PYLE
10
By:
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DOUGLAS DAWSON
/s/ Mana Barari______
12
13
Dated: August 8, 2012
14
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART
15
16
17
By:
/s/ Michael Nader______
Attorneys for Defendant
CHART INTERNATIONAL, INC.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE PER FRCP 41(A)(2)
AND ORDER THEREON
Case No. C12-00141
-2-
ORDER
1
2
The Court having read and considered the foregoing request and stipulation, and with good cause
3
appearing, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Court acknowledges that the parties have entered
4
into a settlement agreement that addresses the payment of their respective fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED
5
6
.
7
Dated:
8
8/9/12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE PER FRCP 41(A)(2)
AND ORDER THEREON
Case No. C12-00141
-3-
1
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
I, Mana Barari, Esq. am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to filed this
2
Stipulation for Dismissal of Complaint with Prejudice per FRCP 41(A)(2) and Order Thereon. In
3
Compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Michael Nader, Esq. has read and
4
approved this Stipulation for Dismissal of Complaint with Prejudice per FRCP 41(A)(2) and Order
5
Thereon and consents to its filing in this action.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE PER FRCP 41(A)(2)
AND ORDER THEREON
Case No. C12-00141
-4-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
