Olson v. Palm Drive Hospital et al
Filing
39
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 6, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
LASCHELLE OLSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. C-11-4606 MMC
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF
DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH
THE COURT’S STANDING ORDERS
v.
PALM DRIVE HOSPITAL, et al.,
Defendants.
/
16
17
On July 19, 2012, plaintiff Laschelle Olson, on behalf of the parties, electronically
18
filed a “Stipulation and Order to Allow Plaintiffs to File an Amended Complaint,” attached to
19
which is a proposed amended complaint. Plaintiff has violated the Civil Local Rules of this
20
District and the Court’s standing orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a
21
paper copy of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See
22
Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable
23
Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.
24
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with the Court’s Standing Orders by
25
immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced document. Plaintiff is
26
hereby advised that if she fails in the future to comply with the Court’s Standing Order to
27
provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed document, the Court may impose
28
sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any electronically-filed
1
2
document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: August 6, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
