Crosthwaite et al v. Fremont Paving Company, Inc. et al
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING 30 Joint MOTION to Continue CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 9/28/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/5/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/1/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2012)
<![CDATA[
Case3:11-cv-04417-JSW Document30 Filed07/31/12 Page1 of 2
1 Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509)
Blake E. Williams, Esq. (SBN 233158)
2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110
3 San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 882-7900
4 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile
mstafford@sjlawcorp.com
5 bwilliams@sjlawcorp.com
6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7 Robert E. Carey, Jr., Esq. (State Bar No. 47556)
CAREY & CAREY, A LAW CORPORATION
8 Post Office Box 1040
Palo Alto, CA 94302
9 (650) 328-5510
(650) 853-3632 – Facsimile
10 rec@careyandcareylaw.com
11 Attorneys for Defendant Fremont Paving Company, Inc.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
F.G. CROSTHWAITE, et al.
Plaintiffs,
15
16
17
v.
FREMONT PAVING COMPANY, INC., a
California Corporation, et al.,
Case No.: C11-4417-JSW
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE STATEMENT and
REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
20
Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
Judge:
21
Defendant Fremont Paving Company, Inc. hereby joins in Plaintiffs’ previously filed
18
Defendants.
19
August 3, 2012
1:30 p.m.
11, 19th Floor
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
22 Request to Continue Case Management Statement. The parties jointly request that the Case
23 Management Conference, currently on calendar for August 3, 2012, be continued to allow
24 Plaintiffs to file their Motions for Summary Judgment and Default Judgment respectfully.
25
1.
Plaintiffs have made several offers to resolve this matter by payment plan.
26 Defendants are unable to commit to any resolution at the current time. Defendants are aware that
27 Plaintiffs must move this matter forward by filing dispositive Motions.
28
2.
There are no issues that need to be addressed at the currently scheduled Case
-1JOINT CMC STATEMENT AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC; PROPOSED ORDER
Case No.: C11-4417-JSW
P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Fremont Paving Company Inc\Pleadings\C11-4417-JSW - JOINT Request to Continue CMC - 073112.DOC
Case3:11-cv-04417-JSW Document30 Filed07/31/12 Page2 of 2
1 Management Conference. In the interest of conserving costs as well as the Court’s time and
2 resources, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Case Management Conference, currently
3 scheduled be continued for 60 days.
4 Dated: July 31, 2012
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON
LAW CORPORATION
5
By:
6
7
8 Dated: July 31, 2012
CAREY & CAREY, A LAW
CORPORATION
9
10
By:
11
12
13
14
15
16
/S/
Michele R. Stafford
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
/S/
Robert E. Carey, Jr.
Attorneys for Defendant Fremont Paving
Company, Inc.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Based on the foregoing, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the currently set Case
October 5, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.
Management Conference is hereby continued to _____________________________. All related
deadlines are extended accordingly.
17
18 Date: ____________________
August 1, 2012
19
_________________________________________
THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2JOINT CMC STATEMENT AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC; PROPOSED ORDER
Case No.: C11-4417-JSW
P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Fremont Paving Company Inc\Pleadings\C11-4417-JSW - JOINT Request to Continue CMC - 073112.DOC
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
