CB2 Builders Incorporated v. ABF Freight System, Inc.
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR Dismissal re 24 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on August 20, 2012. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2012)
Case3:11-cv-04096-EDL Document24 Filed08/17/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
ROGER J. BROTHERS (State Bar No. 118622) (rbrothers@sbllp.com)
CONNOR M. DAY (State Bar No. 233245) (cday@sbllp.com)
BUCHMAN PROVINE BROTHERS SMITH LLP
1333 N. California Blvd., Suite 350
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: (925) 944-9700
Facsimile:
(925) 944-9701
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CB2 Builders Incorporated
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CB2 BUILDERS INCORPORATED,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
Case No. CV 11-4096 EDL
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR DISMISSAL
vs.
ABF FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC. and
DOES 1 through 25, inclusive,
15
16
Defendants.
17
18
This Stipulation and Order For Dismissal is entered into between Plaintiff, CB2 Builders
19
Incorporated (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, ABF Freight System, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and
20
through their respective counsel, as follows:
RECITALS
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1.
On July 13, 2011, Plaintiff filed its complaint against Defendant in the Superior
Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco.
2.
On August 24, 2011, Defendant removed this action to this Court based on federal
question jurisdiction pursuant to Defendant’s Notice of Removal.
3.
On December 30, 2011, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint for violation of
the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 14706, et seq.
28
SHAPIRO BUCHMAN
PROVINE BROTHERS
SMITH LLP
ATTORN EY S AT LAW
60137.002/273627.1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL (Case No. CV 11-4096 EDL)
Case3:11-cv-04096-EDL Document24 Filed08/17/12 Page2 of 3
1
4.
On or about July 23, 2012, Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a Full Mutual
2
Release of Claims whereby Plaintiff and Defendant agreed to resolve their respective claims in
3
this action upon certain terms and conditions, including but not limited to, payment from
4
Defendant to Plaintiff in return for a dismissal of this action with prejudice, each party to bear
5
their own attorneys’ fees and costs.
STIPULATION
6
7
Based on the foregoing recitals, Plaintiff, CB2 Builders Incorporated, and Defendant,
8
ABF Freight System, Inc., by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to dismiss the
9
above-entitled action with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
10
with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
11
BUCHMAN PROVINE BROTHERS
SMITH LLP
12
13
14
/S/Connor M. Day
Connor M. Day
Attorneys for Plaintiff CB2 Builders
Incorporated
Date: August 17, 2012
By:
Date: August 17, 2012
By: ___/S/James Attridge______
JAMES ATTRIDGE
Attorneys for Defendant ABF Freight
System, Inc.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SHAPIRO BUCHMAN
PROVINE BROTHERS
SMITH LLP
ATTORN EY S AT LAW
60137.002/273627.1
-2-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL (Case No. CV 11-4096 EDL)
Case3:11-cv-04096-EDL Document24 Filed08/17/12 Page3 of 3
ORDER
1
2
3
Pursuant to the above Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled
action is dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs.
4
5
August 20
Dated: ____________, 2012
By:
6
_______
Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SHAPIRO BUCHMAN
PROVINE BROTHERS
SMITH LLP
ATTORN EY S AT LAW
60137.002/273627.1
-3-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL (Case No. CV 11-4096 EDL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?