Campbell v. Hill Physicians Medical Group, Inc.
Filing
32
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending Defendant's time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint to 8/20/12. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 8/8/12. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2012)
<![CDATA[
1 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
LISA BARNETT SWEEN (SBN: 191155)
2 NATALJA FULTON (SBN: 254858)
One Sansome Street, Suite 1400
3 San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 362-2580
4 Facsimile: (415) 434-0882
5 Attorneys for Defendant
PHYSICIANS INTEGRATED
6 MEDICAL GROUP, INC. (a dissolved California corporation)
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
Case No. 3:11-cv-04041-SC
11 LARRY CAMPBELL,
Plaintiff,
12
13
FURTHER STIPULATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO AMENDED COMPLAINT [LOCAL
RULE 6-1(A)]
v.
14 HILL PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP, INC.,
PHYSICIANS INTEGRATED MEDICAL
15 GROUP, INC.,
Defendants.
16
Judge: Honorable Samuel Conti
Amended Complaint Filed: March 23, 2012
[JURY TRIAL DEMANDED]
17
CLASS ACTION
18
19
Plaintiff LARRY CAMPBELL (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant PHYSICIANS INTEGRATED
20
MEDICAL GROUP, INC. (“Defendant”), through their counsel of record and pursuant to Local
21
Rule 6-1(a), stipulate and extend the time by which this Defendant has to answer or otherwise
22
respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint.
23
STIPULATION
24
WHEREAS, Plaintiff originally filed this action on August 18, 2011;
25
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his Amended Complaint on March 23, 2012;
26
WHEREAS, Plaintiff served his Amended Complaint naming this Defendant on June 6,
27
2012, and the current deadline for Defendant’s response to the Amended Complaint is August 6,
LEWIS
28
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4836-0958-6192.1
3:11-cv-04041-SC
1
FURTHER STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
1 2012;
WHEREAS, upon mutual agreement, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate and agree that this
2
3 Defendant may have an extension until September 21, 2012, to answer or otherwise respond to
4 Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint;
WHEREAS, this extension of time will not alter the date of any event or deadline already
5
6 fixed by the Court;
ACCORDINGLY, Plaintiff and Defendant hereby stipulate to an extension of time to
7
8 September 21, 2012 for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint.
9 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
10
Respectfully Submitted,
11 DATED: August 8, 2012
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
12
By
/s/
Lisa Barnett Sween
Natalja M. Fulton
Attorneys for Defendant
PHYSICIANS INTEGRATED MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
13
14
15
16
17 DATED: August 8, 2012
BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER & BIRKHAEUSER,
LLP
Robert M. Bramson
Daniel E. Birkhaeuser
18
19
CONSUMER LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Leonard Bennett
Matthew J. Erausquin
20
21
LEWIS
N
R NIA
FO
LI
8/8/12
F
D IS T IC T O
R
A
ER
H
27
onti
amuel C
Judge S
RT
26
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
NO
25
UNIT
ED
24
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
23
S
22
By
/s/
Robert M. Bramson
Daniel E. Birkhaeuser
Leonard Bennett
Matthew J. Erausquin
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LARRY CAMPBELL
C
28
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4836-0958-6192.1
3:11-cv-04041-SC
2
FURTHER STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
