Beard et al v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company

Filing 69

ORDER re 68 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Clerks Notice filed by AT&T Services, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company. Case Management Statement due by 9/21/2012. Case Management Conference reset for 9/28/2012 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/1/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 ANDRE BEARD and GLORIBEL GUERRERO, On Behalf Of Themselves And All Others Similarly Situated, 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiffs, Case No. CV 11 3780 CRB ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR AUGUST 31, 2012 v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, a California Corporation, d/b/a AT&T California; and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Original Complaint Filed: Aug. 1, 2011 First Amended Complaint Filed: Dec. 23, 2011 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; CASE NO. CV 11 3780 CRB ATTORNEYS AT LAW Error! Unknown document property name. 1 2 ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING as set forth in the accompanying stipulation, it is hereby 3 ORDERED that the Case Management Conference originally set for August 31, 2012 is 4 continued to September 28, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco and the 5 Case Management Statement is due by September 21, 2012. DATED: August 1, 2012 8 S RT U O 9 S DISTRICT TE C TA UNIT ED Honorable Charles R. Breyer United States District Judge 10 11 DERED O OR IT IS S 12 J 15 A H ER LI RT 14 . Breyer arles R udge Ch NO 13 R NIA 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. FO 6 N 16 D IS T IC T R OF C 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP - 1- ATTORNEYS AT LAW Error! Unknown document property name. [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; CASE NO. CV 11 3780 CRB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?