Cochrell v. Berkeley Unified School District et al
Filing
56
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Continue Further Case Management Conference. Further Case Management Conference set for 9/28/2012 03:00 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 08/14/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
PAUL L. REIN, ESQ.
CELIA MCGUINNESS, ESQ.
CATHERINE M. CABALO, ESQ.
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN
200 Lakeside Drive, Suite A
Oakland, CA 94612
T: 510/832-5001
F: 510/832-4787
8
BRIAN GEARINGER, ESQ.
GEARINGER LAW GROUP
825 Van Ness Avenue, 4th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94109-7837
T: 415/440-3102
F: 415/440-3103
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff TERRY COCHRELL
6
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
MARK J. ZEMBSCH
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
2180 Milvia Street, Fourth Floor
Berkeley, CA 94704
T: 510-981-6998
F: 510-981-6960
Attorney for CITY OF BERKELEY
PETER P. EDRINGTON, Esq. (074355)
JAMES M. MARZAN, Esq. (133931)
EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP
2300 Contra Costa Boulevard, Suite 450
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-3936
Telephone: (925) 827-3300
Facsimile: (925) 827-3320
Attorneys for Defendant BERKELEY UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT
20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
21
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
22
23
24
25
26
27
TERRY COCHRELL,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BERKELEY UNIFIED SCHOOL
)
DISTRICT; CITY OF BERKELEY; DOES 1 )
through 10, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
CASE NO.: C11-03395 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE FURTHER
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE FURTHER CMC
1
Plaintiff TERRY COCHRELL and Defendants BERKELEY UNIFIED SCHOOL
2
DISTRICT and CITY OF BERKELEY, hereby jointly stipulate and request through their
3
attorneys of record that the Further Case Management Conference currently scheduled for August
4
24, 2012, be continued to September 28, 2012, to allow further settlement discussions among the
5
parties. This request is based on the following good cause:
1. The Court Ordered on June 22, 2012 that the parties return to mediation with
6
Mediator Howard Herman.
7
2. The parties have been working cooperatively in settlement discussions and have set a
8
mediation date of August 24, 2012, from 10 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. This was the only date
9
which accommodated all parties’ schedules. It is the same date as the currently
10
scheduled Further Case Management Conference.
11
3. The parties will exchange mediation statements no later than August 17, 2012, the
12
same date the Case Management Conference statement is due.
13
4. Mediation on August 24, 2012, may change the posture of the case, or may not
14
conclude before the time set for the Further Case Management Conference. Either
15
way, the case may change dramatically between filing of the Joint Case Management
16
Statement and the Conference.
5. The parties would like to proceed with the mediation process on August 24, 2012,
17
without external time constraints.
18
Therefore the parties stipulate and request that the Court set the Further Case
19
Management Conference on September 28, 2012.
20
21
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE FURTHER CMC
1
DATED: August 9, 2012
2
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN
/s/Celia McGuinness
Celia McGuinness
Attorney for Plaintiff TERRY COCHRELL
3
4
5
DATED: August 13, 2012
6
GEARINGER LAW GROUP LLP
/s/Brian Gearinger
Brian Gearinger
Attorney for Plaintiff TERRY COCHRELL
7
8
9
DATED: August 9, 2012
CITY OF BERKELEY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
10
11
/s/Mark Zembsch
Mark Zembsch
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY OF BERKELEY
12
13
14
DATED: August 9, 2012
EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP
15
16
17
18
/s/James Marzan
James M. Marzan
Attorneys for Defendant
BERKELEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE FURTHER CMC
1
4
hereby grants the parties’ request for a continuance of the Further Case Management Conference
from August 24, 2012, to September 28, 2012.
12
ER
H
11
RT
10
HONORABLE SUSAN sILLSTON
on
san Ill t
udge Su
J
NO
9
08/14
DATED: _____________, 2012
FO
8
R NIA
7
UNIT
ED
6
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
5
LI
3
Pursuant to the stipulation, and for good cause show, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court
A
2
ORDER
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE FURTHER CMC
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
