Reynolds v. Lomas
Filing
48
ORDER GRANTING 47 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 45 MOTION to Set Aside Judgment CONFIRMING ARBITRATION AWARD PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. RULE 60 Responses due by 8/28/2012.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/22/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2012)
<![CDATA[
Case3:11-cv-03218-JSW Document47 Filed08/21/12 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
MEGAN BARKER (State Bar No. 245991)
SNR DENTON US LLP
2121 N California Blvd., Suite 800
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: (925) 949-2600
Facsimile: (925) 949-2610
Email: megan.barker@snrdenton.com
STEPHEN J. O’BRIEN (Pro Hac Vice)
LUKE G. MAHER (Pro Hac Vice)
SNR DENTON US LLP
One Metropolitan Square
211 North Broadway, Suite 3000
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
Telephone: (314) 241-1800
Facsimile: (314) 259-5959
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHAEL S. REYNOLDS
11
SNR DENTON US LLP
2121 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD., SUITE 800
WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596
(925) 949-2600
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
MICHAEL S. REYNOLDS,
17
18
19
20
No. 3:11-cv-03218-JSW
Plaintiff,
vs.
ALTON ANDERSON LOMAS,
Defendant.
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT AND
[PROPOSED ORDER]
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-03218-JSW
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Case3:11-cv-03218-JSW Document47 Filed08/21/12 Page2 of 2
1
Plaintiff Michael S. Reynolds, through his undersigned attorneys, hereby moves the Court
2
for a brief extension of time within which to respond to Defendant Alton Anderson Lomas’s
3
Motion for Relief From Judgment (“Motion”), up to and including August 28, 2012, and in
4
support of this motion, states as follows:
5
1.
Defendant filed his Motion for Reconsideration on August 9, 2012. (Doc. 45.)
6
2.
Under Local Civil Rule 7 - 3, and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 5 and 6,
7
8
9
Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motion is due on Thursday, August 23, 2012.
3.
At the time the Motion was filed, Plaintiff’s litigation counsel had withdrawn from
the case, and Plaintiff’s collections counsel had substituted therein. Due to the need for
Plaintiff’s litigation counsel to substitute back into the case and to familiarize themselves with
11
the status of the case and the nature of the Motion, Plaintiff requests additional time, up to and
12
SNR DENTON US LLP
2121 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD., SUITE 800
WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596
(925) 949-2600
10
including Tuesday, August 28, 2012, in which to respond to the Motion.
13
4.
This is Plaintiff’s first request for extension of time.
14
5.
The extension is not sought for purposes of delay and, if granted, will not prejudice
15
any party.
16
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Michael S. Reynolds respectfully requests this Court grant an
17
extension up to and including Tuesday, August 28, 2012 within which Plaintiff may respond to
18
Defendant’s Motion for Relief from Judgment.
19
20
Dated: August 21, 2012
SNR DENTON US LLP
21
By: __________/s/Megan Barker____________
Megan L. Barker
22
23
24
25
26
Attorney for Plaintiff
MICHAEL S. REYNOLDS
Defendant Alton Anderson Lomas’s reply shall be filed by no later than September 4, 2012.
SO ORDERED:
Dated: August 22, 2012
27
28
________________________________
THE HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-03218-JSW
-2-
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
