Whittenburg et al v. Kohl's Corporation
Filing
35
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer staying proceedings on 30 Motion to Certify Class.(crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
RHONDA WHITTENBURG ET AL.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
No. C 11-2320 CRB
ORDER
v.
KOHL’S CORPORATION ET AL.,
Defendants.
/
16
17
Three class-action lawsuits against Kohl’s regarding its alleged practice of recording
18
zip codes during credit card transactions have been consolidated before this Court. See Case
19
Nos. 11-4427; 12-0119; 11-2320. Counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendants in Burdewick v.
20
Kohl’s Dep’t Stores, Inc., No. 11-2320, notified the Court that a settlement had been reached,
21
see dkt. 32, and Plaintiffs in that case filed a motion for preliminary approval of a class-
22
action settlement shortly thereafter. See dkt. 33.
23
Plaintiffs in the other two cases (Nos. 11-4427 and 12-0119) filed a Motion for Class
24
Certification the same day that Plaintiffs in Burdewick notified the court of the settlement.
25
See dkt. 30. As the proposed settlement in Burdewick may resolve some or all of the claims
26
in the other cases, the Court hereby STAYS all proceedings in connection with the Motion
27
for Class Certification (dkts. 30-31) until the hearing on the motion for preliminary approval
28
of the class settlement on October 5, 2012, at 10 a.m., at which all parties in these three cases
1
should appear. The hearing on the Motion for Class Certification on September 28, 2012, is
2
VACATED.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: August 28, 2012
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\CRBALL\2011\2320\Order Staying Proceedings.wpd
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
