Levi Strauss & Co et al v. Papikian Engerprises, Inc et al
Filing
104
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND CLARIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 8/6/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 10-05051 JSW
Plaintiff,
ORDER VACATING HEARING
ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’
FEES AND CLARIFYING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
v.
12
PAPIKIAN ENTERPRISES, INC, et al.,
13
Defendants.
/
14
15
On August 3, 2012, Levi Strauss & Co. (“Levi Strauss”) filed a motion for attorneys’
16
fees, which pertains to its request for attorneys’ fees raised in its motion to hold Defendants
17
Galoust Papikian and Papikian Enterprises, Inc. in contempt. At the hearing on the latter
18
motion, the Court ordered Levi Strauss to submit a further brief on its request for attorneys’ fees
19
by August 3, 2012, and it ordered that Defendants’ response would be due on August 10, 2012.
20
The Court did not contemplate holding a further hearing on a motion for attorneys’ fees.
21
Accordingly, the hearing scheduled for September 14, 2012 is VACATED. Defendants’
22
opposition, if any, remains due on August 10, 2012. At that time, the motion for contempt and
23
the request for attorneys’ fees will be ripe for resolution, the Court will take the matter under
24
submission, and it shall issue a ruling in due course.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 6, 2012
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
