OEM-Tech, Co. v. Video Gaming Technologies Inc

Filing 173

ORDER RE: LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/31/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 8 OEM-TECH, d/b/a CHARLES ESTES, 10 Plaintiff, No. C 10-04368 RS ORDER RE: LEAVE TO AMEND 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 9 12 v. VIDEO GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and DOES 1-50, 13 14 Defendants. ____________________________________/ 15 16 Plaintiff was granted leave to amend in this Court’s prior order granting defendant’s motion 17 for partial summary judgment and motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 169), and subsequently filed 18 amended pleadings, including one longer complaint (Dkt. No. 171), apparently in error. Plaintiff’s 19 most recent filing, styled as a proposed order (Dkt. No. 172), indicates that the intended operative 20 complaint is the “6th Amended Complaint Short Form” (Dkt. No. 170). Upon review, that 21 document appears to comport with the scope of leave to amend granted plaintiff in the prior order, 22 and it is therefore deemed the operative pleading. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 Dated: 8/31/12 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 NO. C 10-04368 RS ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?