Shirley v. WACHOVIA MORTGAGE FSB et al
Filing
86
ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting 80 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Added attorney John Francis Shirley for John Shirley. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
JOHN SHIRLEY, individually and as
trustee of the JOHN F. SHIRLEY
and JULIE E. SHIRLEY 2003 TRUST,
and JULIE SHIRLEY,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
v.
WACHOVIA MORTGAGE FSB, WELLS
FARGO BANK N.A., and DOES 1-10,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, a division of
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., formerly
known as WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB,
19
Third-Party Complainant,
20
21
22
23
24
v.
LSI TITLE COMPANY; LENDER
PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.;
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION
SERVICES, INC.; and ROES 1
through 10, inclusive,
25
Third-Party Defendants.
26
27
28
) Case No. 10-03870-SC
)
) ORDER RE: SUBSTITUTION OF
) COUNSEL
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Now before the Court is Ryan Thomas's ("Thomas") motion to
1
2
withdraw as attorney for plaintiffs John Shirley, Julie Shirley,
3
and the John F. Shirley and Julie E. Shirley 2003 Trust.
4
80.
5
On July 27, 2012, the Court denied the motion without prejudice
6
since, at the time, John Shirley was not an active member of the
7
California bar.
8
his bar membership and all three plaintiffs have consented to his
9
substitution as counsel.
ECF No.
John Shirley seeks to replace Thomas as plaintiffs' counsel.
ECF No. 84.
John Shirley has since re-activated
ECF No. 85.
Accordingly, the Court
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
GRANTS Thomas's motion to withdraw and substitutes John Shirley as
11
counsel for plaintiffs.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
Dated: August 10, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
