Hamilton v. Shoopman et al
Filing
25
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR A STAY 24 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 8/2/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
BERNARD LEE HAMILTON,
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
No. C 10-3682 SI (pr)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S
REQUEST FOR A STAY
v.
COLLEEN SHOOPMAN; et al.,
Defendants.
/
13
14
Plaintiff's request for a stay until the Ninth Circuit rules on his petition in Ninth Circuit
15
Case Number 11-72230 is DENIED as unnecessary. (Docket # 24.) The Ninth Circuit denied
16
the petition in an order filed October 18, 2011.
17
The deadline for plaintiff to (a) file a proof of service showing that he has caused the
18
summons and amended complaint to be served on each defendant or (b) show cause why this
19
action should not be dismissed for failure to serve process within 120 days of the filing of the
20
complaint is now extended until August 31, 2012. Plaintiff is reminded that, if he does neither,
21
the action will be dismissed.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The clerk will mail to plaintiff a copy of docket # 21, which is the Ninth Circuit's order
in Case Number 11-72230.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 2, 2012
_______________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
