Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc., No. 3:2010cv03561 - Document 1253 (N.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED STAY OF EXECUTION OF COSTS by Hon. William Alsup granting 1252 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2012) (Entered: 10/15/2012)

Download PDF

Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc. Doc. 1253 Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document1252 Filed10/15/12 Page1 of 6 1 [counsel listed on signature page] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 GOOGLE INC. 15 Defendant. Case No. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY EXECUTION OF COSTS AWARD PENDING APPEAL Dept.: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor Judge: Honorable William H. Alsup 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY EXECUTION OF COSTS AWARD PENDING APPEAL CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR) sf-3202204 Dockets.Justia.com Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document1252 Filed10/15/12 Page2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 STIPULATION WHEREAS, on September 4, 2012, the Court awarded costs to Google in the amount of $1,130,320 (“Costs Award”) (ECF 1241 at 5); WHEREAS, on October 3, 2012, Oracle filed a Notice of Appeal from the Final Judgment entered by the Court on June 20, 2012 (ECF 1211); 6 WHEREAS, Oracle desires to stay execution of the Costs Award pending appeal, 7 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d), and seeks a waiver of the requirement that it post a supersedeas 8 bond; and 9 WHEREAS, Google is agreeable to staying execution of the Costs Award pending appeal 10 and agrees to waive the requirement that Oracle post a supersedeas bond, provided that Oracle 11 pay the Costs Award with post-judgment interest, provided the Costs Award has not been 12 overturned, at the exhaustion of all appellate proceedings; 13 NOW THEREFORE THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE as follows: 14 1. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d), execution of the costs awarded by this Court on 15 September 4, 2012, shall be stayed pending appeal from the Final Judgment of June 20, 2012. By 16 agreement of the parties, Oracle is not required to post a supersedeas bond. 17 18 2. Provided the Costs Award has not been overturned, at the exhaustion of all appellate proceedings Oracle shall pay that award with post-judgment interest. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY EXECUTION OF COSTS AWARD PENDING APPEAL CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR) sf-3202204 1 Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document1252 Filed10/15/12 Page3 of 6 1 2 3 4 ORDER The foregoing stipulation is approved, and IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: October 15, 2012. 5 Honorable William Alsup Judge of the United States District Court 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY EXECUTION OF COSTS AWARD PENDING APPEAL CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR) sf-3202204 2 Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document1252 Filed10/15/12 Page4 of 6 1 Dated: October 15, 2012 2 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Michael A. Jacobs 3 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP MICHAEL A. JACOBS (Bar No. 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com KENNETH A. KUWAYTI (Bar No. 145384) kkuwayti@mofo.com MARC DAVID PETERS (Bar No. 211725) mdpeters@mofo.com DANIEL P. MUINO (Bar No. 209624) dmuino@mofo.com 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018 Telephone: (650) 813-5600 Facsimile: (650) 494-0792 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) dboies@bsfllp.com 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Telephone: (914) 749-8200 Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (Bar No. 144177) sholtzman@bsfllp.com 1999 Harrison St., Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 874-1000 Facsimile: (510) 874-1460 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ORACLE CORPORATION DORIAN DALEY (Bar No. 129049) dorian.daley@oracle.com DEBORAH K. MILLER (Bar No. 95527) deborah.miller@oracle.com MATTHEW M. SARBORARIA (Bar No. 211600) matthew.sarboraria@oracle.com 500 Oracle Parkway Redwood City, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 506-5200 Facsimile: (650) 506-7114 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Attorneys for Plaintiff ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY EXECUTION OF COSTS AWARD PENDING APPEAL CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR) sf-3202204 3 Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document1252 Filed10/15/12 Page5 of 6 1 Dated: October 15, 2012 2 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP By: __/s/ Robert A. Van Nest 3 ROBERT A. VAN NEST (SBN 84065) rvannest@kvn.com CHRISTA M. ANDERSON (SBN184325) canderson@kvn.com DANIEL PURCELL (SBN 191424) dpurcell@kvn.com 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 4 5 6 7 8 9 SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER (Pro Hac Vice) sweingaertner@kslaw.com ROBERT F. PERRY rperry@kslaw.com BRUCE W. BABER (Pro Hac Vice) bbaber@kslaw.com 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 Telephone: (212) 556-2100 Facsimile: (212) 556-2222 10 11 12 13 14 DONALD F. ZIMMER, JR. (SBN 112279) fzimmer@kslaw.com CHERYL A. SABNIS (SBN 224323) csabnis@kslaw.com KING & SPALDING LLP 101 Second Street - Suite 2300 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 318-1200 Facsimile: (415) 318-1300 15 16 17 18 19 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP IAN C. BALLON (SBN 141819) ballon@gtlaw.com HEATHER MEEKER (SBN 172148) meekerh@gtlaw.com 1900 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 328-8500 Facsimile: (650) 328-8508 20 21 22 23 24 Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY EXECUTION OF COSTS AWARD PENDING APPEAL CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR) sf-3202204 4 Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document1252 Filed10/15/12 Page6 of 6 1 ATTESTATION 2 3 4 5 I, Michael A. Jacobs, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY EXECUTION OF COSTS AWARD PENDING APPEAL. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Robert A. Van Nest has concurred in this filing. 6 7 8 Date: October 15, 2012 /s/ Michael A. Jacobs 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY EXECUTION OF COSTS AWARD PENDING APPEAL CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR) sf-3202204 5

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.