Haggarty et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
94
ORDER re 91 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE EXPERT WITNESS DEADLINES filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/6/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2012)
<![CDATA[
Case3:10-cv-02416-CRB Document91 Filed08/03/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
11
12
13
Jack R. Nelson (SBN 111863)
Email: jnelson@reedsmith.com
Terence N. Hawley (SBN 179106)
Email: thawley@reedsmith.com
David J. de Jesus (SBN 197914)
Email: ddejesus@reedsmith.com
Alicia A. Adornato (SBN 254228)
Email: aadornato@reedsmith.com
REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105-3659
Telephone:
+1 415 543 8700
Facsimile:
+1 415 391 8269
Mark T. Flewelling (SBN 96465)
Email: mflewelling@afrct.com
Robert A. Bailey (SBN 214688)
Email: rbailey@afrct.com
Yaw-Jiun (Gene) Wu (SBN 228240)
Email: gwu@afrct.com
ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASMUSSEN,
CAMPBELL & TRYTTEN LLP
199 South Los Robles Avenue, Suite 600
Pasadena, California 91101-1900
Telephone:
+1 626 535-1900
Facsimile:
+1 626 577-7764
14
15
Attorneys for Defendant
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
20
CHARLES P. HAGGARTY and GINA M.
HAGGARTY, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
21
22
23
24
vs.
Case No.: 3:10-cv-02416-CRB
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
TO CONTINUE EXPERT WITNESS
DEADLINES
First Amended
Complaint Filed: November 5, 2010
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.
Honorable Charles R. Breyer
Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley
25
26
27
28
–1–
US_ACTIVE-110211112.1-AAADORNA
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE EXPERT WITNESS DEADLINES
Case3:10-cv-02416-CRB Document91 Filed08/03/12 Page2 of 3
1
Pursuant to Civil L. R. 7-12, Plaintiffs CHARLES P. HAGGARTY and GINA M.
2
HAGGARTY, and Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., having met and conferred through
3
their counsel of record, submit this Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order concerning changes to the
4
expert witness deadlines in this matter.
RECITAL
5
WHEREAS, the following dates are currently scheduled in this matter:
6
Trial Date
December 3, 2012
2.
Pre-Trial Conference
November 27, 2012
9
3.
Hearing on Motion for Class Certification
September 28, 2012
10
REED SMITH LLP
1.
8
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
7
4.
Hearing on Motion for
Judgment on the Pleadings
August 31, 2012
5.
Fact Discovery Cutoff:
August 22, 2012
6.
Initial Expert Disclosures:
August 31, 2012
7.
Rebuttal Expert Disclosures:
September 14, 2012
8.
Expert Discovery Cutoff:
September 28, 2012
11
12
13
14
15
WHEREAS, the parties are currently engaged in discovery and have agreed that that it is the
16
parties’ best interests and the interests of judicial economy to extend the expert witness deadlines in
17
this matter.
18
STIPULATION
19
THEREFORE, the parties agree through their respective attorneys that expert witness
20
deadlines currently in place shall be extend by 14 days, as follows:
21
Parties’ Proposed Changes To Expert Witness Deadlines
22
Present Date
Proposed Date
September 14, 2012
23
1.
Initial Expert Disclosures:
At the time of disclosure, the
disclosing party will provide
3 dates between Sept. 14-Sept. 28,
2012 that the disclosed expert
is available for deposition.
August 31, 2012
2.
Rebuttal Expert Disclosures:
At the time of disclosure, the
disclosing party will provide
September 14, 2012 September 28, 2012
24
25
26
27
28
–2–
US_ACTIVE-110211112.1-AAADORNA
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE EXPERT WITNESS DEADLINES
Case3:10-cv-02416-CRB Document91 Filed08/03/12 Page3 of 3
3 dates between Sept. 28-Oct. 12,
2012 that the disclosed expert
is available for deposition.
1
2
3
3.
Expert Discovery Cutoff:
September 28, 2012 October 12, 2012
4
5
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
6
7
8
Dated: August 3, 2012
9
Respectfully submitted
McCUNE WRIGHT, LLP
By:
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Charles P. Haggarty and Gina M. Haggarty.
11
12
13
Dated: August 3, 2012
REED SMITH, LLP
14
15
By:
16
Attorneys for Defendant
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
17
/s/ Jack R. Nelson
Jack R. Nelson
18
19
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
20
ER
H
27
J
28
–3–
R NIA
FO
RT
26
. Breyer
arles R
udge Ch
NO
25
IT IS
LI
24
Honorable Charles Breyer
ED
United States DistrictORDER
SO Court Judge
A
23
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
22
DATE: ___________________
August 6, 2012
S
21
UNIT
ED
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
/s/ Richard D. McCune
Richard D. McCune
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
US_ACTIVE-110211112.1-AAADORNA
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE EXPERT WITNESS DEADLINES
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
