AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 3:2009cv04997 - Document 82 (N.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER granting extension to answer (09-4997) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2010)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Doc. 82 Michael R. Lazerwitz (PRO HAC VICE) Jeremy J. Calsyn (State Bar No. 205062) Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756) CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 9000 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 974-1500 (Phone) (202) 974-1999 (Facsimile) mlazerwitz@cgsh.com jcalsyn@cgsh.com lberger@cgsh.com Counsel for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. 8 [Additional counsel listed on signature page] 9 13 Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806) CROWELL & MORING LLP 515 South Flower St., 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 443-5582 (Phone) (213) 622-2690 (Facsimile) jmurray@crowell.com 14 Counsel for Plaintiffs 15 [Additional counsel listed on signature page] 10 11 12 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 19 20 AT&T MOBILITY LLC., et al., Plaintiffs, 21 22 23 24 CASE NO. 09-cv-4997 SI CASE NO. 07-md-1827 SI STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. The Honorable Susan Illston 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT, Case No. 09-cv-4997, SI , 07-md-1827, SI :. Dockets.Justia.com WHEREAS the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, plaintiffs 1 2 AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Corporation, AT&T Services, Inc., Bellsouth Telecommunications, 3 Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Co., AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., and Southwestern 4 Bell Telephone Co. (collectively, “AT&T”) filed a Second Amended Complaint in the above- 5 captioned case against AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei 6 Corporation, Chimei Innolux Corporation f/k/a Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei 7 Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech USA, 8 Inc., Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd., Tatung Co. of America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices 9 Corporation, Epson Electronics America, Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America, Inc., 10 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 11 Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic 12 Components, Inc., Toshiba Mobile Display Technology Co., ltd., and Toshiba America Information 13 Systems, Inc. (collectively, “Stipulating Defendants”), among other defendants, on July 23, 2010; WHEREAS Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on 14 15 August 27, 2010, which the Court granted in part and denied in part on November 12, 2010; WHEREAS Defendants’ Answer to the Second Amended Complaint is currently due 16 17 November 29, 2010 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A), immediately after the 18 Thanksgiving holiday; WHEREAS the Stipulating Defendants desire a reasonable amount of time to respond 19 20 to the Second Amended Complaint; 21 THEREFORE, AT&T and the Stipulating Defendants hereby agree: 22 The Stipulating Defendants’ deadline to answer the Second Amended Complaint will be December 23 15, 2010. 24 Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other 25 signatories thereto has been obtained. 26 DATED: November 24, 2010 27 28 By: ___/s/ Michael R. Lazerwitz_______________ Michael R. Lazerwitz (Pro Hac Vice) 2 STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT, Case No. 09-cv-4997, SI , 07-md-1827, SI :. 1 2 3 4 Jeremy J. Calsyn (State Bar No. 205062) Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756) CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP 2000 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 974-1500 (Phone) (202) 974-1999 (Facsimile) mlazerwitz@cgsh.com 5 6 Counsel for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 By: ____ /s/ Carl L. Blumenstein________________ Carl L. Blumenstein (State Bar No. 124158) NOSSAMAN LLP 50 California Street, 34th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4799 (415) 438-7274 (Phone) (415) 398-2438 (Facsimile) cblumenstein@nossaman.com Counsel for Defendants AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America 14 15 16 17 18 By: ______ /s/John L. Williams__________________ John L. Williams MANCHESTER, WILLIAMS, & SEIBERT 111 N. Market Street, Suite 300 San Jose, CA 95113 (408) 332-5832 (Phone) jlw43912@gmail.com 19 20 21 22 Counsel for Defendants Chi Mei Corporation, Chimei Innolux Corporation f/k/a Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., and Nexgen Mediatech, Inc. 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: ____ /s/ Patrick J. Ahern____________________ Patrick J. Ahern (pro hac vice) BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP 130 East Randolph Drive Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 861-3735 (Phone) (312) 698-2034 (Facsimile) patrick.ahern@bakermckenzie.com 3 STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT, Case No. 09-cv-4997, SI , 07-md-1827, SI :. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Counsel for Defendants Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. and Tatung Co. of America, Inc. By: ____ /s/ Stephen P. Freccero__________________ Stephen P. Freccero (State Bar No. 131093) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 (415) 268-7000 (Phone) (415) 268-7522 (Facsimile) sfreccero@mofo.com 8 9 Counsel for Defendants Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 By: _____ /s/ Simon J. Frankel___________________ Simon J. Frankel (State Bar No. 171552) Timothy C. Hester (pro hac vice) Derek Ludwin (pro hac vice) COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One Front Street, 35th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 591-6000 (Phone) (415) 591-6091 sfrankel@cov.com Counsel for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 By: _____ /s/ Richard S. Taffett__________________ Richard S. Taffett (pro hac vice) Kenneth I. Schacter (pro hac vice) Jon R. Roellke (pro hac vice) Colin C. West (State Bar No. 184095) BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 (415) 393-2000 (Phone) (415) 393-2286 (Facsimile) colin.west@bingham.com Counsel for Defendants Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation 28 4 STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT, Case No. 09-cv-4997, SI , 07-md-1827, SI :. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 By: _____ /s/ John H. Chung____________________ Christopher M. Curran (pro hac vice) John H. Chung (pro hac vice) Kristen J. McAhren (pro hac vice) WHITE & CASE LLP 1155 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 (212) 819-8200 (Phone) (212) 354-8113 (Facsimile) jchung@whitecase.com Counsel for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. By: ______ /s/ Jason C. Murray__________________ Jason C. Murray (State Bar No. 169806) CROWELL & MORING LLP 515 South Flower St., 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 443-5582 (Phone) (213) 662-2690 (Facsimile) jmurray@crowell.com Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice) Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20004 (202) 624-2500 (Phone) (202) 628-5116 (Facsimile) jhoward@crowell.com jmurphy@crowell.com Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice) R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice) Christopher T. Leonardo (pro hac vice) Christopher H. Wood (pro hac vice) ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP 1875 Eye Street NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: 202-580-8822 adams@adamsholcomb.com holcomb@adamsholcomb.com leonardo@adamsholcomb.com 28 5 STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT, Case No. 09-cv-4997, SI , 07-md-1827, SI :. 1 wood@adamsholcomb.com 2 Counsel for Plaintiffs 3 SO ORDERED 4 5 By: _______________________________________ The Honorable Susan J. Illston 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT, Case No. 09-cv-4997, SI , 07-md-1827, SI :.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
