Perez v. Tilton et al
Filing
728
ORDER GRANTING 727 STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' FEES AND COSTS POST DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on August 20, 2012. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2012)
<![CDATA[
Case3:05-cv-05241-JSW Document727 Filed08/20/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
DAMON G. MCCLAIN
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 209508
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: (415) 703-1380
Fax: (415) 703-5843
E-mail: damon.mcclain@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
PRISON LAW OFFICE
DONALD SPECTER
ALISON HARDY, State Bar No. 135966
1917 Fifth Street
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: (510) 280-2621
Fax: (510) 280-2704
ahardy@prisonlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
12
13
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
CARLOS PEREZ,
18
19
v.
C 05-05241 JSW
Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’
FEES AND COSTS POST-DISMISSAL
20
21
22
Judge:
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
Defendants.
23
24
25
On August 14, 2012, the parties agreed to dismiss this action and terminate all provisions of
26
the parties’ August 21, 2006 Consent Decree (see Court Docket No. 69), except the provision
27
requiring Defendants to complete necessary construction in dental clinics, according to the
28
Implementation Plan. (Docket No. 726, Stipulation and Order Re Dismissal of Case.) The
1
Stipulation and Order Re Plaintiffs’ Fees Post-Dismissal
Perez v. Cate (C 05-05241 JSW)
Case3:05-cv-05241-JSW Document727 Filed08/20/12 Page2 of 3
1
parties also agreed that this Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the dental clinic renovation
2
portion of the Consent Decree, and that Plaintiffs may seek to enforce the provision with this
3
Court. (Id.)
4
The parties further agree that, notwithstanding the Stipulation terminating the case, the
5
provisions in paragraph 42 of the Consent Decree providing that Plaintiffs are the prevailing party
6
and may apply for attorneys’ fees for work performed in connection with the Consent Decree
7
shall remain in effect after dismissal of this action. Plaintiffs’ counsel may only apply for fees
8
and costs reasonably incurred to review Defendants’ quarterly updates concerning the renovation
9
projects, and for work reasonably necessary to enforce the Consent Decree’s renovation provision.
10
Paragraph 42 of the Consent Decree and Plaintiffs’ entitlement to fees and costs end when the
11
Consent Decree’s renovation provision terminates.
12
13
14
AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES:
Dated: August 20, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
15
16
s/Damon G. McClain
DAMON G. MCCLAIN
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
17
18
19
20
s/Alison Hardy
ALISON HARDY
Prison Law Office
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Dated: August 20, 2012
21
22
23
24
I, Damon McClain, attest that Alison Hardy authorized the filing of this document on
August 20, 2012.
25
26
27
28
2
Stipulation and Order Re Plaintiffs’ Fees Post-Dismissal
Perez v. Cate (C 05-05241 JSW)
Case3:05-cv-05241-JSW Document727 Filed08/20/12 Page3 of 3
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
5
6
Dated: August 20, 2012
___________________
______________________________
JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Court
SD2004800652
20632850.docx
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stipulation and Order Re Plaintiffs’ Fees Post-Dismissal
Perez v. Cate (C 05-05241 JSW)
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
