Emma C., et al v. Eastin, et al
Filing
1738
ORDER SETTING DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS. Signed by Judge Thelton Henderson on 8/2/12. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
EMMA C. et al.,
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Plaintiffs,
v.
DELAINE EASTIN, et al.,
NO. C96-4179 TEH
ORDER SETTING DEADLINES
FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS
Defendants.
13
14
The Court is in receipt of a filing by Plaintiffs, which seeks to bring a variety of
15 motions. Two of these motions are requests for extensions of time for filing, requesting a 6016 day extension of time to submit objections to Defendants’ monitoring system, and a 14-day
17 extension of time, commensurate with that requested by, and granted to, Defendants by this
18 Court’s order of July 30, 2012. Requests for extension of time are properly administrative
19 motions under Civil Local Rule 7-11, and subject to a 4-day response period, after which
20 they are deemed submitted. Civil L.R. 7-11(b)-(c). Given the potential for confusion
21 inherent in these motions being combined with a substantive motion, the deadline for any
22 objection by Defendants to these requests for extension of time shall be re-set to four days
23 from the issuance of this Order, or August 6, 2012.
24
The substantive motion contained in this filing is a motion to compel Defendant CDE
25 to make a prima facie showing in support of the assertion that the statewide monitoring
26 system has been accepted or approved by the federal Office of Special Education Programs.
27 On this issue, the Monitor has recommended further briefing, but the Court does not intend to
28 make any ruling on the Monitor’s recommendations prior to the filing objections by both
1 parties. However, since Plaintiffs have elected to file a separate motion regarding this issue
2 while simultaneously requesting more time to file their objections, the Court shall set a
3 separate briefing schedule on this motion to compel. Responses to the motion to compel
4 shall be filed on or before August 17, 2012. Replies shall be filed on or before August 24,
5 2012. A hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion shall be held at 10:00 a.m. on September 17, 2012, in
6 Courtroom 2, 17th Floor of the U.S. District Court in San Francisco.
7
8 IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
11 Dated: 8/2/12
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
