(PS) Brittany v. Child Support Services Sacramento et al, No. 2:2016cv01347 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2016)
Court Description: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/28/2016 RECOMMENDING that this lawsuit be dismissed, without prejudice, for plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's orders, and for failure to prosecute the action (see F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(b), L.R. 110); REFERRING this matter to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; ORDERING that any objections be filed within twenty-one (21) days. (Michel, G.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Brittany v. Child Support Services Sacramento et al Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHALLA ALFARO BRITTANY, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:16-cv-1347 GEB AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER CHILD SUPPORT SERVICE SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 On June 20, 2016, the court denied plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, 18 and granted plaintiff leave to re-file the application in proper form. ECF No. 3. On August 12, 19 2016, the court reminded plaintiff that she needed to renew her IFP application or pay the filing 20 fee, and plaintiff was granted 30 days to do so. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff was cautioned that her 21 failure to comply with the order could result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed. 22 Id. Plaintiff has not renewed her IFP application, paid the filing fee, or taken any other action in 23 this case. 24 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this lawsuit be DISMISSED, without 25 prejudice, for plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s orders, and for failure to prosecute the 26 action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (failure to prosecute or to comply with court orders); E.D. Cal. 27 R. (“Local Rule”) 110 (failure to comply with court orders). 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one (21) 3 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 4 objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 5 Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 6 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 7 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 8 DATED: November 28, 2016 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
