(PS) Wallace et al v. Buckingham Property Mgt., et al, No. 2:2016cv01000 - Document 33 (E.D. Cal. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/8/2016 ADOPTING IN FULL 21 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 19 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. (Michel, G.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Wallace et al v. Buckingham Property Mgt., et al Doc. 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLEVELAND WALLACE, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 No. 2:16-cv-01000-TLN-CKD PS v. ORDER BUCKINGHAM PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States 18 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c). On August 11, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, 20 21 which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Objections to the 23 findings and recommendations have been filed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 11, 2016, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiffs’ motion for temporary restraining order (ECF No. 19) is denied. 4 5 Dated: November 8, 2016 6 7 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
