(PC) Pierce v. Sacramento Bee et al, No. 2:2016cv00260 - Document 14 (E.D. Cal. 2016)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/31/16 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEAVON PIERCE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-0260 JAM CKD P v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO BEE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On February 29, 22016, the court ordered that plaintiff pay the $400 filing fee for this 17 18 action within 14 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to pay the filing fee within 14 days would 19 result in dismissal. Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 20 21 prejudice. 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 24 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 25 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 26 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 2 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: March 31, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 pier0260.fnrs 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.