(TEMP)(PC) Jackson v. Sacramento Sheriff Department, No. 2:2015cv02248 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/5/16 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
(TEMP)(PC) Jackson v. Sacramento Sheriff Department Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VERNITA JACKSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-2248 AC P (TEMP) v. ORDER AND SACRAMENTO SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 17 On November 12, 2015, the court ordered plaintiff to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or 18 pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days and cautioned plaintiff that failure to do so would 19 result dismissal of this action without prejudice. The thirty-day period has now expired, and 20 plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or 21 paid the appropriate filing fee.1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to 22 23 randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. 24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 27 28 1 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the court’s order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of her current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 2 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 3 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 4 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 5 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 6 (9th Cir. 1991). 7 DATED: January 5, 2016 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.