(PC) Light v. Charon et al, No. 2:2015cv02134 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/14/15 ORDERING the clerk of the court assign a district court judge to this case. U.S. District Court Judge Garland E. Burrell randomly assigned to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THURL H. LIGHT, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-2134 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND J. CHARON, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 17 By an order filed October 13, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma 18 pauperis application within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a 19 recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and 20 plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. 21 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice, 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 28 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 1 1 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 2 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: December 14, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 ligh2134.fifp 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.