(PS) Prasad v. Owen Loan Servicing, LLC et al, No. 2:2015cv00555 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2016)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/11/16 RECOMMENDING that this actin be dismissed with prejudice; referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections to these F&Rs within 14 days. (Benson, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Prasad v. Owen Loan Servicing, LLC et al Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BAHARI PRASAD, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-0555 KJM GGH PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et al., Defendants. 16 17 By order filed August 5, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and twenty-eight days 18 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court informed plaintiff of the 19 deficiencies in the complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not 20 filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the reasons given 22 in the August 5, 2015 order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed 23 with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 27 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 28 Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 fourteen days after service of the objections. Failure to file objections within the specified time 2 may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 3 Cir. 1991). 4 Dated: January 11, 2016 5 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 GGH:076/Prasad0555.fta 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
