Johnson v. Yafai et al, No. 2:2015cv00226 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2016)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/3/16 recommending that plaintiff's Motion for default judgment 7 be granted. F&R referred to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SCOTT JOHNSON, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-0226 TLN CKD Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RASHAD YAFAI, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. This matter was 18 submitted without oral argument. The undersigned has fully considered the briefs and record in 19 this case and, for the reasons stated below, will recommend that plaintiff’s motion for default 20 judgment be granted. 21 Plaintiff is a permanently disabled wheelchair user. Defendants operate a liquor store 22 located in Stockton Heights, California. The complaint alleges that plaintiff visited the subject 23 establishment in August and September, 2014 and encountered architectural barriers which 24 denied him full and equal access. 25 The record reflects that defendant AbdoYahia Nagi was served by substituted service on 26 February 16, 2015, defendant Musa Ali Hassan was served by substituted service on February 17, 27 2015, and defendant Rashad Sam Yafai was served by substituted service on March 23, 2015. 28 ECF Nos. 4, 5, 6. Defaults were entered on July 14, 2015. Plaintiff thereafter filed a motion for 1 1 default judgment with a proof of service reflecting service of the motion on defendants. Plaintiff 2 seeks an entry of default judgment in the amount of $8,000 pursuant to California Civil Code 3 section 52(a)1 and attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $4,115.00 as well as injunctive 4 relief.2 5 Entry of default effects an admission of all well-pleaded allegations of the complaint by 6 the defaulted party. Geddes v. United Financial Group, 559 F.2d 557 (9th Cir. 1977). The court 7 finds the well pleaded allegations of the complaint state a claim for which relief can be granted. 8 Anderson v. Air West, 542 F.2d 1090, 1093 (9th Cir. 1976). The memorandum of points and 9 authorities and affidavits filed in support of the motion for entry of default judgment also support 10 the finding that plaintiff is entitled to the relief in the form of statutory damages, attorney’s fees 11 and injunctive relief requested in the prayer for default judgment, which does not differ in kind 12 from the relief requested in the complaint. Henry v. Sneiders, 490 F.2d 315, 317 (9th Cir.), cert. 13 denied, 419 U.S. 832 (1974). Plaintiff is entitled to statutory damages for each “offense,” i.e., 14 each obstructed visit. See Lentini v. Cal. Ctr. for the Arts, 370 F.3d 837, 847 (9th Cir. 2004); see 15 also Feezor v. DeTaco, Inc., 431 F.Supp.2d 1088 (S.D. Cal. 2005). The amount of attorney’s fees 16 requested by plaintiff is reasonable. With respect to plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief, the 17 court finds that defendants have failed to provide accessible parking spaces, an accessible 18 transaction counter, accessible paths of travel through the merchandise aisles and an accessible 19 restroom, as required by 28 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 36, Appendix D, (“ADAAG”). 20 There are no policy considerations which preclude the entry of default judgment of the type 21 requested. See Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-1472 (9th Cir. 1986) (factors that may be 22 considered by the court are possibility of prejudice to the plaintiff, merits of plaintiff’s substantive 23 claim, sufficiency of the complaint, sum of money at stake in the action; possibility of a dispute 24 ///// 25 1 26 27 28 The Unruh Civil Rights Act provides, in relevant part, for a minimum statutory damage amount of $4,000 per violation. Cal. Civ. Code § 52(a). 2 Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief requiring defendants to remove identified architectural barriers only to the extent such alterations are readily achievable. 2 1 concerning material facts; whether the default was due to excusable neglect, and strong policy 2 underlying the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure favoring decisions on the merits). 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 4 1. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (ECF No. 7) against defendant be granted; 5 2. Plaintiff be awarded statutory damages in the amount of $8,000.00 and attorney’s fees 6 7 and costs in the amount of $4,115.00, for the total sum of $12,115. 3. Plaintiff be granted an injunction requiring defendants to provide readily achievable 8 property alterations to the property known as “Corona Liquor” a facility located at 2280 E. Main 9 Street, Stockton, California that consist of the following, all in accordance with the Americans 10 With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and the Americans With Disabilities Act Accessibility 11 Guidelines (ADAAG) contained in 28 Code of Federal Regulations Part 36, Appendix D: 12 accessible parking spaces, an accessible transaction counter, accessible paths of travel through the 13 merchandise aisles and an accessible restroom. 14 4. The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. 15 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 16 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 17 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 18 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 19 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 20 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 21 Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 22 Dated: March 3, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 4 johnson-yafai0226.def 26 27 28 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
