Johnson v. Solorio et al, No. 2:2014cv02683 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/16/15 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations filed September 15, 2015 (ECF No. 16 ) are ADOPTED IN FULL; and Plaintiff's Application for Default Judgment (ECF No. 11 ) is DENIED without prejudice to the filing of a subsequent properly-supported motion. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
Johnson v. Solorio et al Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SCOTT JOHNSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-2683-MCE-EFB v. ORDER RAFAEL T. SOLORIO; MARIA D.SOLORIO; ALFREDO SOLORIO, and DOES 1-10, 16 Defendants. 17 The assigned magistrate judge held a hearing on Plaintiff’s Application for Default 18 19 Judgment (ECF No. 11) on March 4, 2015. On September 15, 2015, the magistrate judge filed 20 Findings and Recommendations herein (ECF No. 16) which contained notice to the parties that 21 any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No 22 party filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the Findings and Recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed September 15, 2015 (ECF No. 16) are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment (ECF No. 11) is DENIED without prejudice to the filing of a subsequent properly-supported motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 16, 2015 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.